Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Collective letter to Runner's World

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    You're a funny woman!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    you're a funny boy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    I have nothing against people who JOG for fitness... what I have a problem with is a publication that 1) associates this activity with running for SPORT; 2) degrades the sport (and the "fitness activity") by encouring people to embrace the "penguin" mentality to the extent of deliberately sabotaging performance by scarfing down burgers and pizza during a race; and, 3) perpetuates bogus information month after month (new utimate runner's power diet in every issue!) like a FITNESS TABLOID!

    Runner's World is an abomination; an insult to everyone who takes running remotely seriously! Somebody has to stand up to these bogus fatass double-chin having JOGGERS who try to increase their circulation by appealing to America's fatass double-chin having masses!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    You're done now. Do you see how much support you got? It has nothing to do with b*lls, we are just not haters like yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    I DON'T GET IT! A few weeks back there was a thread some 50 posts long in which most of the posters here expressed serious disdain towards that pathetic magazine, and now that somebody wants to take action y'alls testicles are running dry! Come on!

    Leave a comment:


  • blacklily
    replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    >Runners World is a magazine aimed at the casual
    >jogger. It is basically a fitness
    >magazine. Track and Field news is basically
    >designed for people who are either serious or
    >make a living in Track and Field. It is
    >basically a trade magazine for Track and Field in
    >this country.

    Spot on re: the difference between the two magazines. I suspect most Runners World readers don't even consider themselves athletes, but rather run to stay in shape.

    I don't read Runners World, as it focuses on distance. However, why all the elitist fuss about RW on this board? Aren't their readers the same individuals whom distance athletes want to watch them at meets? The same individuals whom these athletes want to buy their sponsor's products? The same individuals whose entry fees help pay for America's relatively lucrative marathon & 5K circuit? Who cares if they're running a six-hour marathon or not running a 5K like Adere. Does the average guy playing football in your local park play like Emmitt Smith? Average guy in a pickup basketball game play like Shaq? No. Rather than dump on the casual runner, with America's ridiculous obesity rates be glad they're even out there. The strategy should be to get them excited about track & field as a sport, not marginalize them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    Don't like it, don't look at it.
    But I do like pickin' on runners.ha ha

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    Runners World is a magazine aimed at the casual jogger. It is basically a fitness magazine.
    Track and Field news is basically designed for people who are either serious or make a living in Track and Field. It is basically a trade magazine for Track and Field in this country.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    >It's evident that the general concensus among
    >T&FN readers seems to be that Runner's World
    >magazine sucks. I propose that we write a
    >collective letter to RW editor Amby Burfoot
    >condemning their awful magazine and demanding
    >that they change the name of the publication to
    >"Jogger's World.">

    I think Good Housekeeping sucks. I find it less of a strain to completely ignore the magazine than to write a letter to the editor telling he/she how much I hate it. If you don't like it DON'T BUY IT OR READ IT!

    jd

    Leave a comment:


  • polevaultpower
    replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    If you don't like RW, then don't subscribe to it and don't read it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    OK if you're a Jogger's World fan, then start a seperate thread to write your own letter praising their joggerhood! They might be the greatest bunch of plodders who ever ran a six hour marathon, but they have no right to associate themselves with real athletics!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Collective letter to Runner's World

    Then why do they have such a big circulation? They don't write to track fans. They write for joggers (runner wannabes, but they can't break 24 for a 5K.) Leave them alone. They are fine for what they want to be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest started a topic Collective letter to Runner's World

    Collective letter to Runner's World

    It's evident that the general concensus among T&FN readers seems to be that Runner's World magazine sucks. I propose that we write a collective letter to RW editor Amby Burfoot condemning their awful magazine and demanding that they change the name of the publication to "Jogger's World." I'll write the first paragraph:


    Dear Mr. Burfoot,

    Your magazine sucks. You write about running as if it were not a real sport, but rather a contest to see who can finish a 5K with the biggest love handles.


    C'mon, who's with me? Submit your suggestions and subsequent paragraphs!
Working...
X