The WC in swimming has just concluded. As in all WC's and OG's many world records fell. They have become quite rare in T&F. My question is: "Has T&F evolved so far ahead of swimming in the past century or is there a different explanation?"
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
T&F vs. swimming
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Re: T&F vs. swimming
fewer season-ending injuries
less variables in training
more high-tech training world-wide
in swimming, the form charts are adhered to with much more regularity. It's been a more gradual build (ignoring the EG wo-men) over the years. Track goes in fits and spurts.
Comment
-
Re: T&F vs. swimming
not to take anything away from some decent athletes, but does anyone else think it is silly that swimming has so many different types of strokes? i find it strange that the events are the same distance, but different races because different technique is involved. that is the same reason that i think race walking is kind of lame, not to mention very funny looking.
what are everyone's thoughts?
in my opinion different strokes in swimming are pointless and race walking should be eliminated from track and field unless we also have add a 400 meter skip and a 330 yard gallup and perhaps 100 meter bear crawl
Comment
-
Re: T&F vs. swimming
The tradition of different strokes has been established, so I think it should be respected. From a non-runner's point of view, it might seem silly that we take 2 ways to jump over a pole, 2 ways to hop into a pit, 2 ways to run a 110m, 400m, 3000m.
Comment
Comment