Re: It was 20 years ago today...
>it's a part of track & field history, none-the-less. i, too, am saddened that
>these "records" are still in places. everybody look at this:
Marion Jones
>10.70
Merlene Ottey 21.64
Marie Jose-Perec 48.25
Ana Quirot
>1:54.44...
how refreshing does that list look. i mean just looking at the
>marita koch race is, i believe, evidence of her drug use. the race was poorly
>executed! she started to tie up in the final few strides of the race.
>obviously it wasn't her technique that fueled those records.
Hassiba Boulmerka 3:55.30
Gabriela Szabo 8:21.42
Paula Radcliffe 30:01.09
The ironic thing is that there are question marks against several of the names you have mentioned above. I don't agree that Koch's run was poorly executed - she only tied up at the end and she had been running at a faster pace than ever before, plus there was a headwind in the home straight and no-one close to her. You must be very difficult to please!
>it's a part of track & field history, none-the-less. i, too, am saddened that
>these "records" are still in places. everybody look at this:
Marion Jones
>10.70
Merlene Ottey 21.64
Marie Jose-Perec 48.25
Ana Quirot
>1:54.44...
how refreshing does that list look. i mean just looking at the
>marita koch race is, i believe, evidence of her drug use. the race was poorly
>executed! she started to tie up in the final few strides of the race.
>obviously it wasn't her technique that fueled those records.
Hassiba Boulmerka 3:55.30
Gabriela Szabo 8:21.42
Paula Radcliffe 30:01.09
The ironic thing is that there are question marks against several of the names you have mentioned above. I don't agree that Koch's run was poorly executed - she only tied up at the end and she had been running at a faster pace than ever before, plus there was a headwind in the home straight and no-one close to her. You must be very difficult to please!
Comment