Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Five Big Answers ...

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Five Big Answers ...

    February, 2005 -- Track & Field News staff brought up five major queries about the 2005 season in the wake of expectations from the 2004 season:

    1. What Did Alan Webb Learn In The Olympic Year?

    2. How Will Jeremy Wariner Adapt to Turning Pro?

    3. Who’s Winning The Doping War?

    4. Can Stacy Catch The Russians?

    5. Ritz's Pro Debut



    Five Big Answers

    1. Webb: 2004 taught Webb to screw his racing head on straight, take on all comers, roll with the punches and not to hang on for the ride. Result? His second-straight national championship victory in the 1,500m; Top-5 all-time USA mile; new PB in the 1,500m; AR in the 2-mile. Top-5 all-time in the 5,000m. 2004:s sit-and-wait in the championships cost Webb a spot in the Olympic semi-finals. The 2005 Webb was a new machine, one which determined its own fate. 2005:s championships saw Webb make it through the rounds, to the WC final, run a gutsy 100m race, and bring back hope to those faithful few who rode along his every race.

    2. Wariner: Would prove to handle the riches and fame, expectations and scrutiny with class, style and the same grace as his predecessor, Michael Johnson. Would win some, lose some, be tested by a pesky ex-teammate - and an NCAA athlete - while on American soil, and foil the best in the world while here in Europe. First (we know what) kid under 44,00. Turning pro would bring world-record talk from the Wariner camp, and 800m record-talk from his message board supporters.

    3. Dope: Last I checked, the score was still tied late into the fourth-quarter, with Jones, Montgomery, Kenteris and Thanou facing fourth and long after quarterback sacks and/or fumbles near their own goal lines. Montgomery hoping the wolves stay still and quiet while he launches his long hail mary pass to a small group of uncertain sheep. Jones replaced late in the game, and apparently will hold a press conference declaring her fumbles in the zone were due to being pooped from a long defensive game.

    4. Stacy: Insofar as the Russians could not catch the Russian, Stacy, unfortunately, had no chance on earth, in heaven or anywhere in between to play on the same field. Tafnut held his hopes high throughout this 2005 campaign, and was with Dragila through to her untimely disappearance from the WCs - which he witnessed on a computer monitor. Pyrek proved to be a sound, able and willing foe, and seems to have taken Stacy:s place in the try-to-take-the-victory-if-Issy-No-Heights competition. A win is a win is a win, nonetheless, and Stacy was without one on the international stage this year.

    5. Ritz: Run Ritz, Run. 2005 would prove to mirror 2004, with high expectations following a good performance, and a good performance followed by certain disaster. Ritz got his training act together after injury stifled his 2004 OG hopes. Ritz turning pro meant changing coaches, changing workouts and changing his attitude toward his training. Ritz fired up his pro career by taking a close third (28.25) in a multi-loop race in Italy on New Year:s Eve, finishing one second behind Sergey Lebed for the victory. Ritz stamped his pro career:s first victory by beating a host of Africans in Belfast one week later. Ritz took his confidence, backed by a long training stretch, into the USATF meet, and won the long course ahead of Torres and Broe. Then Ritz got blasted by the Africans in the World Championships. While Bekele fought off his own demons in his double-duty chores, Ritz hobbled home with a blister and a disappointing appearance in March. Pro Cross Country-Ritz grade: B.
    ____________________________

  • #2
    EPelle, excellent follow-up!

    I would add

    1. Webb's tactical errors this year will go into the Central Processor also and help him become the AR-holder.

    2. Wariner will never run MJian times, but he will continue to be a great champion

    3. The Doping War, like the War Against Terrorism, Poverty, Drugs, Hunger, etc., is essentially unwinnable, but we'll have our moments and it IS worth fighting.

    4. No one, even St. Stacy, can catch Isin, for a long, long time.

    5. Ritz will struggle with injuries because his body can't take the rigors of high mileage (IMO).

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by tafnut
      2. Wariner will never run MJian times . . .
      You may be right, tafnut, but I wouldn't bet a whole lot of money on that.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by tandfman
        Originally posted by tafnut
        2. Wariner will never run MJian times . . .
        You may be right, tafnut, but I wouldn't bet a whole lot of money on that.
        we'd ALL love it if he did, but I, for one would be thrilled by a 43.70 - getting into the low 43s is a whole lot more than we gave MJ credit for (compared to his 19.32).

        Comment


        • #5
          Ritz

          tafnut,

          I would say that Ritz problem (for several years) was not the mileage but his shoes.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Ritz

            Originally posted by trackhead
            I would say that Ritz problem (for several years) was not the mileage but his shoes.
            Really? Not to say that shoes cannot be a contributing factor, but anyone in his position should, at a minimum, be working with a good podiatrist to minimize mechanical issues related to feet, shoes, etc. Not to mention someone at his shoe company who would/should be making custom shoes for him.

            From what I understand, Ritz is a member of the high mileage school of training (not Gerry Lindgren high mileage, but on the right hand side of the bell curve). I tend to agree with tafnut on this – it would appear that his body is one that breaks down under this kind of stress.

            Of course I don’t really know how he trains, but if he is a high mileage guy it would be interesting to see how he would respond to training that does not pile up the miles. Most folks will be hesitant to change the routine that brings them success, but it sure would be nice to see what Ritz could do if he puts together two or more consecutive injury-free years.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Ritz

              Originally posted by bad hammy
              "From what I understand, Ritz is a member of the high mileage school of training (not Gerry Lindgren high mileage, but on the right hand side of the bell curve)."

              AND

              "Of course I don’t really know how he trains, but if he is a high mileage guy it would be interesting to see how he would respond to training that does not pile up the miles."
              Do you read what you write at all?

              FYI- Ritz trains at the middle of the bell curve.

              Comment


              • #8
                i dont think ritz should wait for the curve but go at the bell 8)
                phsstt!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Ritz

                  Originally posted by Strunk
                  Originally posted by bad hammy
                  "From what I understand, Ritz is a member of the high mileage school of training (not Gerry Lindgren high mileage, but on the right hand side of the bell curve)."

                  AND

                  "Of course I don’t really know how he trains, but if he is a high mileage guy it would be interesting to see how he would respond to training that does not pile up the miles."
                  Do you read what you write at all?

                  FYI- Ritz trains at the middle of the bell curve.
                  From what I am reading right now, you are a bit of a jerk, but in any case, it is possible that I could have been clearer here.

                  The ‘from what I understand’ part is from reading things online and in print. The conventional wisdom on Ritz is that he is a relatively high mileage trainer.

                  The ‘I don’t really know how he trains’ statement is a fact. I don’t have access to his training logs, his coaches, his training partners or him.

                  Regardless of what I said or where he is on the mileage bell curve, he is injury prone. Fans of the sport wish this was not so, and hope that he is able work things out so that he can stay healthy for and extended period of time.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Five Big Answers ...

                    February, 2005 -- Track & Field News staff brought up five major queries about the 2005 season in the wake of expectations from the 2004 season:

                    1. What Did Alan Webb Learn In The Olympic Year?<<

                    1) Drug-free distance runners cannot compete at the highest levels of the sport, at least not during that part of the season when their competitors are "peaking."

                    2. How Will Jeremy Wariner Adapt to Turning Pro?<<

                    Very easily.

                    3. Who’s Winning The Doping War?<<

                    Drugs, chemists, procurers, dealers.

                    4. Can Stacy Catch The Russians?<<

                    No chance in hell.

                    5. Ritz's Pro Debut

                    Flop.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      1. wont be world class
                      2.time will tell(no wr)
                      3.we DO NOT KNOW
                      4.is that a joke
                      5.is that a joke too?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Ritz

                        Originally posted by bad hammy
                        Originally posted by trackhead
                        I would say that Ritz problem (for several years) was not the mileage but his shoes.
                        Really? Not to say that shoes cannot be a contributing factor, but anyone in his position should, at a minimum, be working with a good podiatrist to minimize mechanical issues related to feet, shoes, etc. Not to mention someone at his shoe company who would/should be making custom shoes for him.

                        From what I understand, Ritz is a member of the high mileage school of training (not Gerry Lindgren high mileage, but on the right hand side of the bell curve). I tend to agree with tafnut on this – it would appear that his body is one that breaks down under this kind of stress.

                        Of course I don’t really know how he trains, but if he is a high mileage guy it would be interesting to see how he would respond to training that does not pile up the miles. Most folks will be hesitant to change the routine that brings them success, but it sure would be nice to see what Ritz could do if he puts together two or more consecutive injury-free years.
                        I know that at the time of his stress fractures (c. 2004) he was running in the Kantaras -- no wonder he was getting hurt.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X