Originally posted by Flumpy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Brianna Rollins-McNeal provisionally suspended [gets 5 years]
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by El Toro View Post
Wrong date by the doctor? Resolvable and correctable situation BY THE DOCTOR at the patient's request.
Forging (yes, that's what she did) and uttering a document (however defined) is an offence in all countries with a functioning legal system. Luckily, in this case, it's resolvable by non-criminal sanction.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/v...04-p577sp.html
I hope that athlete's lawyers are advising them about the potential local and/or international criminal risks of lying in semi-judicial proceedings, attempting to subvert the same proceedings and making false documents for gain, all in relation to sport drug testing regimes.
It will just take some aggrieved sponsor or eager beaver prosecutor to give some of these athletes a criminal conviction, major debt and possible jail sentence.
Leave a comment:
-
-
She got caught. She should not have been allowed to run in the trials. Oh hang on, this is the US. Lawsuit capital of the World. Go figure!!!
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RunningInCircles View PostShe claims she thought that the doctor's office had written down the wrong date, and she was trying to change the date on the doctor's note to make it more accurate.
Forging (yes, that's what she did) and uttering a document (however defined) is an offence in all countries with a functioning legal system. Luckily, in this case, it's resolvable by non-criminal sanction.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Flumpy View Post
What else needs to be going on? She admittedly tampered with evidence after missing a test having already served a ban for missing tests. She's lucky it's only 5 years.
The excuse is just a smokescreen and kinda reprehensible that she would reveal that (And insinuate the authorities are racist) to get ahead of what is likely the ban being upheld today.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RunningInCircles View Post
I think it's odd to get a 5 year suspension because you were one day off on the date of a doctor's appointment. It seems to me like something else is going on that's not in the article. The CAS decision is expected in the next few days, and it may provide some additional information.
The excuse is just a smokescreen and kinda reprehensible that she would reveal that (And insinuate the authorities are racist) to get ahead of what is likely the ban being upheld today.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RunningInCircles View PostAIU claims that changing the date on the doctor's note was "tampering" with medical evidence, hence the tampering charge.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rhizobium View Post
The multi-year suspension for the "tampering" charge, according to McNeal, was because she changed the date on a doctor's note about the medical procedure to say that it occurred 1 day before the missed drug test, when in reality the medical procedure was 2 days before the missed drug test.
She claims she thought that the doctor's office had written down the wrong date, and she was trying to change the date on the doctor's note to make it more accurate. AIU claims that changing the date on the doctor's note was "tampering" with medical evidence, hence the tampering charge.
Maybe AIU thinks she was lying about the reason for changing the date on the note, meaning that they might think she changed the date on the note for some nefarious reason, not because she thought the doctor had the wrong date. But I'm not sure what one day difference makes, or why she would intentionally try to mislead AIU about the date of the medical procedure.
I think it's odd to get a 5 year suspension because you were one day off on the date of a doctor's appointment. It seems to me like something else is going on that's not in the article. The CAS decision is expected in the next few days, and it may provide some additional information.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Vault-emort View Post
Doesn't Hayward Field have 9 lanes? Officials can plan to reduce any effect her entry may have.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dave View PostIt seems strange that she will be allowed to compete at the OT. Assuming that she makes the finals, she will have caused two people not to advance in during the rounds. Those two will in effect be eliminated by someone who is ineligible to go to the Olympics.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jjimbojames View PostSame thing that got Hammer thrower Mark Dry banned: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/51649229. I’m sure he’ll be watching with interest!
Some free advice to athletes - just don't lie kiddies, because people can check your bullshit. Here's the details of Jepkosgei's tampering decision and 4 year ban with one year discount for admitting it before the final decision.
https://www.athleticsintegrity.org/d...sion_FINAL.pdf
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: