Originally posted by ATK
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A False Start Solution?
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Atticus View PostWhen the majority of people who bought tickets and came to the stadium are not happy, that's not a good business model.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ATK View PostBut I'm not even sure that was the case in either situation. Maybe Bolt, but he ran 2 other events in 2011. Bromell was not even close to being the draw at the Birmingham meet. I'm sure DAS's first 100m of the year and Hodgkinson's first outdoor race of the year far surpassed the men's 100m in terms of stadium fan's interest.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Atticus View PostOnly because it was in the UK. How would that have played out in the Jacksonville meet?
I understand your point to a degree, but as others have noted, big name false starts dont happen enough to justify a change. And a person winning a race, but not actually winning would be confusing for the public who already is confused at our sport.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ATK View Post
But I'm not even sure that was the case in either situation. Maybe Bolt, but he ran 2 other events in 2011. Bromell was not even close to being the draw at the Birmingham meet. I'm sure DAS's first 100m of the year and Hodgkinson's first outdoor race of the year far surpassed the men's 100m in terms of stadium fan's interest.
I was in the stadium I Daegu when Bolt false started. Was it disappointing? Very. Was it an “issue”? No. They’re the rules.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Bowie View PostThe current rules are good and they work. The answer is for sprinters to stop taking a shot.
Sitting at the Pac-12 Champs last week I spent a few moments thinking of how nice it was that there was not a single false start in my three days there. Line 'em up, fire the gun, watch the race. Bolt FS'd in Daegu? Bubka NH'd in Barcelona? Oh well - them's the rules. Moving on . . .
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cigar95 View PostYeas ago someone mentioned (in the magazine, I think) making a FS a penalty instead of a DQ. For each false start, move the blocks back by a meter. In the 200, move it back 2 meters.
I think the issue there was a practical one moreso than philosophical.
Comment
-
Comment