Originally posted by Powell
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
4x400: time to make changes?
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by El ToroThe whiny bitches complaining about this rule were the same whiny bitches complaining about their team being pushed around under the old rule.
Interestingly, the race that caused the rule-makers to do something about this also occurred in Australia. The last exchange of the men's 4x400 at the 1985 World Cup in Canberra was a real mess, probably caused by the Australian anchor man. The officials did not call a foul on him, but the whole world was watching and the conclusion was that this was an example not just of a home-team call by the officials, but also of an area where disorderly conduct was much too common. And it was too hard to do anything about that without a specific rule governing the exchange process. So they enacted just such a rule.
Comment
-
Originally posted by piabaOriginally posted by PowellOriginally posted by 26mi235Time to change the rule that there has to be an affirmative finding that there was advantage taken by being out of place, sort of like stepping on the line in the straight (cf. Powell in the 100m).
Comment
-
Originally posted by 26mi235The extra difference on the run down the straightaway is trivial, that is the piece the is a mere 5mm. You would have trouble measuring it on the track with a tape measure.
Comment
-
Originally posted by piabaOriginally posted by 26mi235The extra difference on the run down the straightaway is trivial, that is the piece the is a mere 5mm. You would have trouble measuring it on the track with a tape measure.
The only thing that really matters is orderlyness and lack of confusion at the hand-off line (which would avoid and big vector changes near the line -- such a change will still cause more of a problem because of changing directions at speed while tiring than from extra distance on the straightaway).
Comment
Comment