Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Harder to win Olympic 10,000-5,000 or World-x?

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
    [Which begs the question- If the olympics just happen to be held in 1981 could Virgin win the 10,000? And if not , why not when he beat everyone in a harder race? :?
    Well, I remember Salazar running in the World Cup 10000 in 81, and coming 3rd, so I assume he was US champ the same year? Did Virgin take part?

    Leave a comment:


  • SQUACKEE
    replied
    Originally posted by bekeselassie
    Wait a minute. Ya know what's the hardest? :evil: The Olympic 5000.

    Especially when the history's most remarkable 1500 runner is in the race and you run a 13:20 pace, even though you're capable of running 12:37!!!! :x :x
    Glad to see your not bitter.

    Leave a comment:


  • bekeselassie
    replied
    Wait a minute. Ya know what's the hardest? :evil: The Olympic 5000.

    Especially when the history's most remarkable 1500 runner is in the race and you run a 13:20 pace, even though you're capable of running 12:37!!!! :x :x

    Leave a comment:


  • tlb747
    replied
    Originally posted by bekeselassie
    World XC. Like he said, more competition. Glad I could offer my unique spin.
    :lol:

    Leave a comment:


  • SQUACKEE
    replied
    Originally posted by bad hammy
    Olys - fewer of them. Besides, as recently as 1981 an American won the men's XC champs - how hard can it be?? :shock: :lol:
    Which begs the question- If the olympics just happen to be held in 1981 could Virgin win the 10,000? And if not , why not when he beat everyone in a harder race? :?

    Leave a comment:


  • bekeselassie
    replied
    World XC. Like he said, more competition. Glad I could offer my unique spin.

    Leave a comment:


  • kuha
    replied
    The answer should be obvious. The definitive book on the subject is titled:

    The Toughest Race in the World: A look at 30 years of the IAAF World Cross Country Championships (IAAF/ATFS, 2002).

    Very highly recommended, by the way.

    Leave a comment:


  • SQUACKEE
    replied
    Originally posted by bad hammy
    Olys - fewer of them. Besides, as recently as 1981 an American won the men's XC champs - how hard can it be?? :shock: :lol:
    This could only happen with alien intervention. :twisted:

    Leave a comment:


  • bad hammy
    replied
    Olys - fewer of them. Besides, as recently as 1981 an American won the men's XC champs - how hard can it be?? :shock: :lol:

    Leave a comment:


  • kuha
    replied
    Yeah, I'd agree that its the World Cross... In part, the historical results of this race (with all the repeat winners) seem to prove that luck and cleverness play no part whatsoever in winning the thing--fitness and experience count for pretty much everything.

    Leave a comment:


  • tlb747
    replied
    World-X, more compitition.

    Leave a comment:


  • SQUACKEE
    started a poll Harder to win Olympic 10,000-5,000 or World-x?

    Harder to win Olympic 10,000-5,000 or World-x?

    0
    World - X
    0%
    0
    Olympic 10,000 or 5,000
    0%
    0
    I believe the World -X is the hardest race in the world to win, well unless your name is Bekele of course. Whatdoyasay?
Working...
X