Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2022 women's AOY

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 18.99s
    replied
    Originally posted by Conor Dary View Post
    It seems they're engineering a season with minimal risk of losing, and lots of rest between meets to ensure only fast times.

    Running fast and not losing...Sounds a good plan to me!
    Not losing because of dodging and hiding. Meh.

    Leave a comment:


  • jjimbojames
    replied
    I think it would be someone like Pechonkina in 2003 - WR, but not much of a season outside Russia and finished 3rd at the WC, then 3rd in the TFN rankings for 400mH, so I can’t see her being too high up the AOY

    Leave a comment:


  • DET59
    replied
    How often has someone who has set a world record (not relay) in a standard "in stadia" track and field event not been selected for AOY because it was given to someone else who did not break a world record that year? I believe on the men's side, since 2000, it has pretty much gone to athlete's breaking a world record except in years when no records were broken (Barshim 2017, Bondereko 2013, etc).... is the women's side similar? Was 2022 was pretty unique in the number of world records broken (in this century) ?

    Has anyone who has broken a standard event world record ever been ranked lower than Amusan at 6th? Strange (but great) year indeed !


    Last edited by DET59; 12-31-2022, 09:13 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DET59
    replied
    Originally posted by Conor Dary View Post

    They might not offer as much as the men.
    I think having an "early" WC not in Europe, COVID, combined with a "late" 2021 Olympics were bigger factors for lack of DL competitors than one might think, plus DL prize money is just not that great for those at the top of the game.

    Leave a comment:


  • Conor Dary
    replied
    Originally posted by berkeley View Post

    Nothing new, but it just seems particularly bad this year on the womens side.
    They might not offer as much as the men.

    Leave a comment:


  • berkeley
    replied
    Originally posted by Conor Dary View Post
    The DL meets are fine for the most part. I found them entertaining.

    Coe with the Rankings for qualifying is trying to improve the meets. But you can only do so much if the stars don't want to run.

    Anyways nothing new. The Covett series was supposed to get Coe and Ovett to race more. That was a bust but some memorable races nonetheless, such as the 3000 in Crystal Palace in 1982
    Nothing new, but it just seems particularly bad this year on the womens side.

    Leave a comment:


  • Conor Dary
    replied
    Meanwhile....

    After winning Olympic gold as a teenager, Mu became the youngest woman to ever claim both world and Olympic titles in an individual athletics event when she again held off Hodgkinson to secure victory on home soil at the World Athletics Championships Oregon22. Clocking a world-leading 1:56.30, Mu maintained her unbeaten year and an outdoor win streak that dates back to September 2019.

    Leave a comment:


  • gm
    replied
    Lest we forget, Covid was (and is) still a thing. I don't count abbreviated seasons against anyone right now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Atticus
    replied
    Originally posted by Conor Dary View Post
    But you can only do so much if the stars don't want to run.
    With the advent of more sophisticated peaking regimens, it's no surprise that medal contenders back off the smaller pay days for the bigger one (enhanced by contract incentives).

    Leave a comment:


  • Conor Dary
    replied
    The DL meets are fine for the most part. I found them entertaining.

    Coe with the Rankings for qualifying is trying to improve the meets. But you can only do so much if the stars don't want to run.

    Anyways nothing new. The Covett series was supposed to get Coe and Ovett to race more. That was a bust but some memorable races nonetheless, such as the 3000 in Crystal Palace in 1982

    Leave a comment:


  • ATK
    replied
    Originally posted by berkeley View Post
    but we are being deprived of too many great head to heads.
    Wait, so your telling me the creation of the Diamond League over a decade ago, which was billed as getting the biggest stars to go head to head, hasn't solved this issue yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • Conor Dary
    replied
    It seems they're engineering a season with minimal risk of losing, and lots of rest between meets to ensure only fast times.

    Running fast and not losing...Sounds a good plan to me!
    Last edited by Conor Dary; 12-30-2022, 07:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • berkeley
    replied
    It may have been said earlier in this long thread, but I find it disappointing that 4 of the top 10 had seasons of only 4 competitions in their specialties. I'm not saying they don't deserve their ranking, but we are being deprived of too many great head to heads. It seems they're engineering a season with minimal risk of losing, and lots of rest between meets to ensure only fast times.

    On another note, unbelievable series of 8 fast times by Shelly-Ann. I can't remember a better example of high level consistency, men or women. And at 35! The above 4 should take a leaf out of her book. I think she should be number 3.

    Leave a comment:


  • CD203
    replied
    Originally posted by gh View Post
    fwiw, my top 10:

    1. Rojas
    2. McLaughlin
    3. Fraser-Pryce
    4. Jackson
    5. Kipyegon
    6. Amusan
    7. Garcia
    8. Gidey
    9. Ealey
    10. Jeruto
    Very much like this list. Personally might substitute Chepngetich or Bol for Jeruto but it's a really good and accurate ranking to me

    Leave a comment:


  • Conor Dary
    replied
    Personally I thought Mu had a marvelous season and did what she wanted to accomplish. Whether she should have run more is neither here nor there. But is just my opinion. As Gauss once said...'Few, but ripe!'
    Last edited by Conor Dary; 12-30-2022, 05:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎