Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2023 NCAA indoors
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
6.97s by Julien is insane! Especially when there's still the NCAA indoors to be run. She ran 7.04s last year and went on to run 10.81s and 10.80s wind aided. So perhaps, she could challenge and break sha carri's collegiate record this season. I don't see anyone challenging her at all for the NCAA 100m title.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by gm View Post
IN THE FIRST SECTION AS I SAID... Two runners were at or near the lead at 1600 and cruised off to the outside and stopped their watches. Perhaps they were pacemakers.
Comment
-
-
The NCAA has taken a nice leap forward this year. The performances in the sprints in particular are just breathtaking.
You're still letting one performance sink in then bam another one hits you. 6.48 celebrating 5 strides away followed by 6.97 bam! This isn't even NCAAs yet?! Do they get better?!
Congrats to the athletes for putting in the work and delivering.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by steveu View Post
LOL, well you did invite a lot of comments, questions and speculation by making a post that initially had almost no context. If you'd be sitting next to a friend, watching the ACC meet together, than your comment wouldn't have needed anything. But to all of us tracking all the races in all the meets for the entire conference weekend ... you know ... 😁
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
I know it's ONLY D3, but Wisconsin-La Crosse's Sam Blaskowski won the 60 in 6.65 and then ran 21.29 to win the 200 on a flat 200m track at the WIAC meet. That broke the facility (UW-Stout) record of 21.53 set by Andrew Rock in 2004. Rock turned out to be pretty decent, IIRC.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
Comment