Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Multi-events 2023

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Projected first-day performances

    Athlete
    100
    LJ
    SP
    HJ
    400
    Total
    Warner 10.14 8.05 14.99 2.05 48.07 4680
    LePage 10.35 7.54 15.99 1.99 46.84 4567
    Skotheim 10.88 7.73 14.48 2.20 48.27 4526
    Ehammer 10.73 8.12 14.10 2.03 47.40 4517
    Victor 10.72 7.56 16.29 2.05 48.20 4492
    Thompson 10.52 7.69 14.84 1.98 47.74 4439
    Tilga 11.16 7.66 16.19 2.07 48.71 4406
    Gaio 10.54 7.59 14.42 1.94 47.08 4380
    Mullings 10.59 7.29 15.09 2.08 49.53 4346
    Eitel 10.48 7.20 15.27 2.01 48.66 4338
    Hauttekeete 10.89 7.47 14.08 2.12 49.30 4307
    Moloney 10.81 7.40 14.28 2.02 48.01 4289
    Dubler 10.79 7.61 13.17 2.11 49.84 4276
    Gletty 10.78 7.18 16.07 1.95 49.02 4241
    Hernández 10.62 7.49 13.33 2.05 49.99 4231
    Benkunskas 10.77 7.03 14.85 2.09 50.05 4214
    Williams 10.97 7.54 14.52 1.92 49.40 4145
    Kopecký 11.06 7.47 14.00 1.95 48.54 4143
    Meyer 10.93 7.27 14.02 1.92 47.67 4140
    Samuelsson 11.14 7.22 14.41 2.03 49.21 4131
    Roosen 10.75 7.35 14.52 1.79 47.69 4118
    Wiesiołek 11.08 7.33 15.58 1.96 50.53 4118
    Golubovic 10.91 6.96 15.60 1.96 49.52 4116
    Spyridonidis 11.19 7.28 14.64 2.02 49.78 4115
    Nowak 11.31 7.06 14.94 2.01 49.93 4038
    Pittomvils 11.32 7.10 15.31 2.02 51.09 4025
    Nilsson 11.38 6.82 15.23 1.95 49.77 3936
    Mechler 11.10 6.97 14.08 1.90 49.77 3917
    Peristéris 11.72 7.07 13.47 1.81 51.75 3605

    Comment


    • Projected second-day performances

      Athlete
      110H
      DT
      PV
      JT
      1500
      Total
      Nilsson 15.01 47.81 5.15 66.69 4:18.51 4287
      Tilga 14.85 51.39 4.75 64.05 4:21.91 4199
      Warner 13.48 47.56 4.90 58.62 4:38.65 4149
      Golubovic 14.03 48.40 4.90 58.26 4:29.67 4147
      Victor 14.66 52.26 4.80 66.20 4:43.74 4147
      LePage 13.87 50.38 4.97 57.52 4:42.77 4134
      Kopecký 14.23 45.29 5.00 61.90 4:34.12 4112
      Skotheim 14.52 44.80 5.00 61.55 4:26.38 4111
      Roosen 14.12 42.75 4.65 61.01 4:18.43 4059
      Nowak 14.49 46.76 4.70 58.92 4:21.37 4058
      Gletty 14.22 46.24 4.85 56.95 4:28.66 4048
      Benkunskas 14.26 46.17 4.83 63.02 4:48.66 4001
      Eitel 14.34 44.80 4.80 61.11 4:36.57 4000
      Samuelsson 14.58 42.43 4.95 60.73 4:35.52 3968
      Dubler 14.13 42.41 4.90 56.75 4:37.26 3939
      Ehammer 13.43 38.83 5.11 55.98 4:48.72 3938
      Pittomvils 14.56 46.77 4.81 57.61 4:42.62 3924
      Meyer 14.26 43.12 4.90 57.24 4:41.28 3917
      Williams 14.11 44.95 4.75 57.19 4:45.98 3899
      Mechler 14.38 39.79 4.92 53.74 4:28.29 3872
      Hauttekeete 14.10 38.56 5.01 53.29 4:33.17 3871
      Spyridonidis 14.27 40.66 5.10 48.79 4:40.58 3807
      Gaio 13.61 43.15 4.80 47.76 4:45.96 3802
      Mullings 13.95 43.77 4.77 58.50 5:06.41 3801
      Wiesiołek 15.01 45.15 4.53 53.36 4:27.92 3783
      Peristéris 15.53 44.88 4.80 56.78 4:43.11 3751
      Moloney 14.84 44.98 4.75 54.99 4:54.71 3723
      Thompson 14.32 37.36 4.50 67.08 4:58.09 3721
      Hernández 14.54 41.26 4.65 58.22 5:01.63 3661

      Comment


      • Projected leaderboard progression, first day

        100
        LJ
        SP
        HJ
        400
        1
        Warner
        1062
        1
        Warner
        2135
        1
        Warner
        2924
        1
        Warner
        3774
        1
        Warner
        4680
        2
        LePage
        1011
        2
        Ehammer
        2014
        2
        LePage
        2807
        2
        Skotheim
        3630
        2
        LePage
        4567
        3
        Eitel
        980
        3
        LePage
        1956
        3
        Ehammer
        2748
        3
        LePage
        3601
        3
        Skotheim
        4526
        4
        Thompson
        970
        4
        Thompson
        1952
        4
        Victor
        2743
        4
        Victor
        3593
        4
        Ehammer
        4517
        5
        Gaio
        966
        5
        Gaio
        1923
        5
        Thompson
        2732
        5
        Ehammer
        3579
        5
        Victor
        4492

        Comment


        • Projected leaderboard progression, second day

          110H
          DT
          PV
          JT
          1500
          1
          Warner 5723
          1
          Warner 6543
          1
          Warner 7423
          1
          Warner 8140
          1
          Warner 8829
          2
          Ehammer 5566
          2
          LePage 6436
          2
          LePage 7337
          2
          LePage 8038
          2
          LePage 8701
          3
          LePage 5558
          3
          Victor 6301
          3
          Ehammer 7151
          3
          Victor 7982
          3
          Victor 8639
          4
          Skotheim 5434
          4
          Ehammer 6207
          4
          Victor 7150
          4
          Skotheim 7868
          4
          Skotheim 8637
          5
          Gaio 5405
          5
          Skotheim 6197
          5
          Skotheim 7107
          5
          Ehammer 7829
          5
          Tilga 8605

          Comment


          • I'll post the heptathlon projections tomorrow.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Davidokun View Post
              I'll post the heptathlon projections tomorrow.
              As always thanks for this. Great stuff.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by donley2 View Post

                As always thanks for this. Great stuff.
                You're very welcome. Enjoy the meet.

                Comment


                • Projected
                  Rank
                  Athlete Federation Projected
                  Score
                  ± PB PB/Sum
                  of PBs
                  1 Damian Warner Canada 8829 -189 95,9
                  2 Pierce LePage Canada 8701 0 95,3
                  3 Lindon Victor Grenada 8639 89 95,6
                  4 Sander Aae Skotheim Norway 8637 339 96,0
                  5 Karel Tilga Estonia 8605 125 95,6
                  6 Simon Ehammer Switzerland 8455 -13 96,2
                  7 Manuel Eitel Germany 8338 145 95,8
                  8 Makenson Gletty France 8289 148 95,5
                  9 Daniel Golubovic Australia 8263 -73 96,3
                  10 Ondřej Kopecký Czechia 8255 -55 98,5
                  11 Marcus Nilsson Sweden 8223 -106 97,0
                  12 Cedric Dubler Australia 8215 -178 95,4
                  13 Edgaras Benkunskas Lithuania 8213 321 94,1
                  14 Finley Gaio Switzerland 8182 233 94,6
                  15 Jente Hauttekeete Belgium 8178 364 93,7
                  16 Sven Roosen Netherlands 8177 121 95,9
                  17 Kendrick Thompson Bahamas 8160 145 96,8
                  18 Ken Mullings Bahamas 8147 214 96,1
                  19 Fredrik Samuelsson Sweden 8099 -73 94,7
                  20 Tim Nowak Germany 8096 -133 95,9
                  21 Marcel Meyer Germany 8057 95 96,3
                  22 Devon Williams USA 8044 -301 95,6
                  23 Ashley Moloney Australia 8012 -637 98,5
                  24 Niels Pittomvils Belgium 7949 -273 96,5
                  25 Alexandros Spyridonidis Greece 7922 5 96,7
                  26 Paweł Wiesiołek Poland 7901 -432 94,2
                  Taking Davidokun's work with some more infos.

                  Expected Decathlons based on SBs is of course tricky, but we can take some notes from these charts. The biggest expected improvements tend to indicate a likely breakthrough, as it means the athletes are doing way better individually than they used to, or, at least, than they did during their record Dec.
                  This is reinforced by the ratio PB/Sum of PBs. Guys with a low ratio (below 96, even more below 95) have a record that doesn't quite match their abilities (here Benkunskas, Gaio, Hautekeette), so they possess the skills to beat this record, and they are in shape to do it. They probably won't reach those scores, but a big PB is on the cards.
                  Skotheim being young and healthy, almost of his PBs were set recently, hence the very high projection (= sum of PBs - 6), then again unlikely but a 8400+ seems doable.
                  I'm quite surprised by LePage's projection but now I feel he will be over this score. At least if he's healthy, which was not the case every time he's come to Götzis.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Davidokun View Post

                    You're very welcome. Enjoy the meet.
                    Thanks again David for all the information and charting...it makes following the multis really interesting!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by DET59 View Post
                      . . . . . AK scored 5 points over her previous PR totals.
                      If I have it right, Annie is nearly unique in that her Hep score is higher than her *current* PRs, not merely the PRs coming in. I can't think of a way to do that other than a windy mark in one of the three that count.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by DET59 View Post

                        Thanks again David for all the information and charting...it makes following the multis really interesting!
                        You're very welcome. Stimulating interest in combined events is the prime directive.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by cigar95 View Post
                          If I have it right, Annie is nearly unique in that her Hep score is higher than her *current* PRs, not merely the PRs coming in. I can't think of a way to do that other than a windy mark in one of the three that count.
                          I believe the OP means her PR's prior to the meet. I read it the same way you did (which, I agree, is basically impossible unless the very unlikely event of a higher level athlete actually setting all 8/10 PRs in one meet, and then happened to have a windy mark)

                          Same with Garland (I didn't calculate AK's, but I used the World Athletics website to Calculate Garland's) When he scored his PR 8720 last May in Fayetteville he PR'd in the 100, 110H, HJ, PV, LJ and JT. Combined with his marks in the other 4 events he scored considerably higher than the sum of his pre- May 6, 2022 PR's listed in the event progression part of the World Athletics stats site. This is pretty unusual at a high level (6500+ 8500+) scoring over 100% of the sum of your PR's that you had prior to the meet.

                          It's interesting to examine Mayer's 2018 Word Record (maybe the most "perfect" decathlon ever)... he scored 99.5% of the sum of his previous PRs and set I believe 3 new PRs and tied one.

                          It's fascinating to follow David's charts (I know they are not predictions) as they tend to be very accurate, especially as he adjusts them during big meets. It really makes watching a multi even more interesting. The PB "pecentage range" of 94-97 is pretty dead on at a high level meet, though occasionally you get an amazing perfornance (like Mayer's WR , or Garland's CR/College Absolute) they goes beyond expectation (which is what makes a multi record so much fun to watch, you kind of see it coming but at the same time the trend to "regress to the mean" is always there)...

                          'Would love to see some "100% plusers" at Gotzis... I'll even settle for a 98.3% from Warner (as that would break the WR) though I think highly unlikely at age 33

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by DET59 View Post

                            I believe the OP means her PR's prior to the meet. I read it the same way you did (which, I agree, is basically impossible unless the very unlikely event of a higher level athlete actually setting all 8/10 PRs in one meet, and then happened to have a windy mark)
                            Nope, I meant her current PRs. Which is indeed only achievable with a windy mark and close to best effort in all of the events.
                            Actually, her PB exceeds what she would theoretically be able to do.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by ZazaShoya View Post

                              Nope, I meant her current PRs. Which is indeed only achievable with a windy mark and close to best effort in all of the events.
                              Actually, her PB exceeds what she would theoretically be able to do.
                              You are absolutely right and I and the one who misintepreted!~ Cigar95 was also correct in his understanding of the post. It's amazing her 12.95w "makes up" for the SP that was 7cm off her PR and her 800 which was only .5 from her previous PR. Like you said, it could only be achieved with a windy mark; and in her case a very minimal wind (2.4) in only one event Even accounting for this slight wind, she still had am amazing "PR" day scoring over 200 points (103%?) on the sum of her pre-Trials PRs, adding over 500 points to her previous Hep best, and moving her from 1800+ on the all-time performances list into the top 100 of all-time performances. Almost the "perfect day"... Let hope she can get back to the same level or better.

                              Comment


                              • KJT reckons she has wintered well and says she enjoyed training through rather than competing for a change. It enabled to catch up on lost training from all her recent injuries.

                                Whilst the 100mh is always a good indicator of an athletes fitness - sustaining that speed & rhythm for the entirety of the race is tough - her HJ is going to be the first telling event. She hasn't been over 1.9 since 2019, her post-achilles-injury best being only 1.86. She only went 1.77 in Gotzis last year, and then onto 1.83 in Eugene (1.84 at the CWG). If she wants to challenge for a medal in Budapest she needs at least 1.89 here so she can build to 1.9+.

                                13+ in the SP will be great for her, and then in the 200m she has to aim for under 23.50 here to build to 23.3 or faster in Budapest. Whilst Anna Hall has overtaken her as the fastest heptathlete, she still needs as much as she can over the others in this event. Then, of course, the LJ. I have no idea what she is capable of this year - her last LJ was 6.33 a the CWG and she went 6.37 last year in Gotzis which is her best post-achilles-injury mark. So, by her standards, pretty poor. If she can go 6.5+ here it will be brilliant.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎