First, the ground has been pretty thoroughly covered on what she took and whether or not it really is a stimulant. The basic problem is Kelli's failure to list the medication, the reason for its usuage and to get an IAAF reading on whether it was to be a problem on race day. Had she correctly filled out the form, none of this would be going on.
My question is, how will this affect her rankings in the 100 & 200. She obviously lost massive "honors", but Edwards' two medals may give USATF a bit of an "honors" boost. She would probably lose the two WL marks at the meet, but ATFS will probably carry the 200, as that race was "clean". I assume that RH, DJ etc are working on this even as I type. I would be interested in the feedback.
Ordinarially, I would have just addressed this to the TFN email, but I havn't had much luck with responses since my return from Paris.
My question is, how will this affect her rankings in the 100 & 200. She obviously lost massive "honors", but Edwards' two medals may give USATF a bit of an "honors" boost. She would probably lose the two WL marks at the meet, but ATFS will probably carry the 200, as that race was "clean". I assume that RH, DJ etc are working on this even as I type. I would be interested in the feedback.
Ordinarially, I would have just addressed this to the TFN email, but I havn't had much luck with responses since my return from Paris.
Comment