No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

[gh]

(at least not for now)

http://my.aol.com/news/news_story.psp?t ... 1000106059

(not sure how IAAF can do anything but be bound by the earlier CAS decision)

[MJD]

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

>(at least not for
>now)

http://my.aol.com/news/news_story.psp?type
>2&cat=0400&id=200309240921000106059

(not sure
>how IAAF can do anything but be bound by the
>earlier CAS decision)

Two different slants on the same meeting?

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/s ... oly24.html

[tandfman]

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

>Two different slants on the same meeting?<

I don't think so. My read is that the Seattle Times article came out before the Wednesday IOC press conference.

[MJD]

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

>I
>don't think so. My read is that the Seattle
>Times article came out before the Wednesday IOC
>press conference.

Probably right. Looked at the date and not the time.

[michael lewis]

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

Let them eat steroids.

[MJD]

Re: No IOC Action Against Jerome Young

>I don't think so. My read is that the Seattle
>Times article came out before the Wednesday IOC
>press conference.

So what is going on?

“...read the decision taken by the USATF (USA Track and Field) Doping Appeal Board [regarding the Young case] and cannot understand how, based on the facts presently available to the Commission, any authority could have reached the conclusion that there was no doping offense.”

http://www.letsrun.com/2003/wadayoung.php