After witnessing Paul Tergats sensational world record run, only just holding out his pacemaker, who improved dramatically (3-4mins) his marathon time it occurred to me..
In the future will the best athletes become so good that it would be beneficial to have a pacemaker allowed on drugs to pull them through fast splits. I've been wrestling internally with the ethics of this and thought why not post it and get some opinion.
Imagine if Wilson Kipkiter had someone, to lead him through 700m in 1min 27 secs there is probably no one else in the world who could do this cleanly. Maybe would see a 1.40 800m clocking.
I would be very interested to hear what people thought of this, if a pacemaker pulls out before the finish and is not part of the results, does it actually have a negative effect on the sport?
In the future will the best athletes become so good that it would be beneficial to have a pacemaker allowed on drugs to pull them through fast splits. I've been wrestling internally with the ethics of this and thought why not post it and get some opinion.
Imagine if Wilson Kipkiter had someone, to lead him through 700m in 1min 27 secs there is probably no one else in the world who could do this cleanly. Maybe would see a 1.40 800m clocking.
I would be very interested to hear what people thought of this, if a pacemaker pulls out before the finish and is not part of the results, does it actually have a negative effect on the sport?
Comment