Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Log in
Forgot password or user name?
or
Sign Up
Log in with
Search in titles only
Search in Current Track Events only
Search
Advanced Search
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Groups
Member List
Calendar
Forum
Current Track Events
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the
FAQ
. You may have to
register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
200m or 400m - which is more exciting now?
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Search
Page
of
3
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
1
2
3
template
Next
eldrick
Senior Member
Join Date:
Oct 2005
Posts:
14147
Location:
19th hole st andrews
Share
Tweet
#31
10-04-2006, 07:07 PM
well, you've got a 0.5s difference there between lane 3 & lane infinity
i can't see difference between 1 & 8 being anywhere in the same ballpark
Comment
Post
Cancel
gh
Administrator
Join Date:
Oct 2005
Posts:
69530
Location:
west of Westeros
Share
Tweet
#32
10-05-2006, 06:28 PM
A lane 3 in 1966 probably close to a lane 1 today. (Smith's run out of lane 1 at the '68 Oly Trials is one of the great performances ever.)
Comment
Post
Cancel
paulthefan
Senior Member
Join Date:
Oct 2005
Posts:
5034
Location:
Location, Location.
Share
Tweet
#33
10-07-2006, 01:52 AM
finally gh is fully committed to the proposal that synthetic tracks are faster than dirt......yureka!
... nothing really ever changes my friend, new lines for old, new lines for old.
Comment
Post
Cancel
eldrick
Senior Member
Join Date:
Oct 2005
Posts:
14147
Location:
19th hole st andrews
Share
Tweet
#34
10-07-2006, 03:02 AM
Originally posted by
paulthefan
finally gh is fully committed to the proposal that synthetic tracks are faster than dirt......
don't know about that ?!
more relevant is his "belief" of "tighter" tracks in ole days, meaning slower times :
give modern example :
oslo was 105/95
brussels is 125/75
"standard" is 116/84
oslo "tightness" still affords compensation of 11m of more stretch to make up lost time on curve compared to standard :
i've asked jrm at least 1/2 dozen times to analyse it & give us an answer ( it's a top-level physicist's problem ) :
but he never replies !
gh
if you get a chance, ask dapena for an opinion
Comment
Post
Cancel
Previous
1
2
3
template
Next
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎
Comment