Originally posted by paulthefan
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tsatoumas does it again, 8.54!!!
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ghOriginally posted by lonewolf...At the NCAA last week there was not even a drag available.. fortunately we had pretty good broomers who maintained a pit that, imo, was fair to all competitors...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bad hammyOriginally posted by ghOriginally posted by lonewolf...At the NCAA last week there was not even a drag available.. fortunately we had pretty good broomers who maintained a pit that, imo, was fair to all competitors...
The Tone Belt incident had nothing to do with the condition of the pit.. under NCAA rules foul jumps are judged visually instantly and not by committee or an appeals jury. The official on the board correctly declined to measure a foul jump, which request/demand, btw, was not made by the jumper but by people yelling from the stands.. we do not take directions from the stands.
Tone Belt expressed natural disappointment at the narrow foul but, to his credit, did not challenge the call. It was a one cm foul like a thousand other one cm fouls.. he may have been the best jumper there but not when it counted.. he had six jumps and fouled five of them.. being the favorite does not earn any favoritism.. there is no provision in the rules to allow the favorite to jump until he wins..
Erica McClain did not win either..
I understand automatic leveling gizmos are more common in Europe but the only place I have worked with the "Sandboni" is at 96 Olympics and at Stanford a couple of years ago when one of the gizmos malfunctioned midway through the competition.
They are great labor saving devices and produce a beautiful pit but are very bulky and require about 30-40' of runout behind the pit for the rails. Also they are very slow and still require a pit "dresser" for dribbles and dabs.. that said, time and space permitting, I love 'em..
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Kurt Francis originallyJust look at the video...very wavy surface of the sand. I suspect that the mark was more like 8.16-8.36m.Originally posted by In response to Paulthefan's confusion Kurt FrancisAs far as what I believe to be the more correct measurement, I did not indicate from such that the poor grooming accounted for the difference in distance. The fact that I infered that the jump was a 8.16-8.36m jump was based on the nearest mark in the sand vs. the indicator alongside the pit, and also from my extensive video review of the speed of approach, takeoff efficiency, angle of trajectory, leg extension, and hang time. It was not due to the problems with the pit grooming.
Comment
-
-
Ok let me restate the case for us skeptics even though Kurt is convinced that I have misrepresented his puritanical snow white position...
the pit looks like the sand box at McDs play land... (that could bias a jump in paulthefans opinion up to a decimeter. I will give it an 8.4 for that reason...
we need more data before we crown him the next Dombrowski.... nothing really ever changes my friend, new lines for old, new lines for old.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Per AndersenOriginally posted by paulthefanif he cant jump within 20inches of his early june PR on the more important stage then I will assume that he never did... sorry..
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Per AndersenOriginally posted by lonewolfWhere can I find a pic or clip of this jump/pit?
Comment
-
Comment