This ought to start a ruckus:
"Why is it a man's world?
Will Buckley: The Observer/The Guardian Unlimited
On Wednesday at The Oval, the Women's Sports Foundation (WSF) and invited guests will meet to 'slam the appalling media coverage of women's sport in this country'. This contention is backed up by research that shows that only 2.65 per cent of all sports coverage in the tabloids this year was dedicated to women's sport and that on average there were 10 days a month in the print media when women's sport received nil coverage. It is further backed up by a telephone poll of 625 respondents, the far-from-surprising results of which are embargoed until Wednesday."
That was the beginning of a Brit article. All one has to do is look at Sports Illustrated to see the short shrift women get. On the other hand, look at how balanced T&FN coverage is. Admittedly track and swimming and gymnastics and figure skating has balanced coverage anywhere, but track is closer to the mainstream (a tributary?) than the others.
Nww, just to peeve everyone - I would like to posit that women don't 'deserve' Sports Illustrated equality because women in general do NOT follow sport as closely as men as evidenced by the lack of attendance at women's sports compared to men. The Women's National Soccer Team has good support, but they are an exception, not the rule.
In sum, kudos to T&FN for 'our' equality, but kudos also to SI for not being so PC as to have equal coverage.
"Why is it a man's world?
Will Buckley: The Observer/The Guardian Unlimited
On Wednesday at The Oval, the Women's Sports Foundation (WSF) and invited guests will meet to 'slam the appalling media coverage of women's sport in this country'. This contention is backed up by research that shows that only 2.65 per cent of all sports coverage in the tabloids this year was dedicated to women's sport and that on average there were 10 days a month in the print media when women's sport received nil coverage. It is further backed up by a telephone poll of 625 respondents, the far-from-surprising results of which are embargoed until Wednesday."
That was the beginning of a Brit article. All one has to do is look at Sports Illustrated to see the short shrift women get. On the other hand, look at how balanced T&FN coverage is. Admittedly track and swimming and gymnastics and figure skating has balanced coverage anywhere, but track is closer to the mainstream (a tributary?) than the others.
Nww, just to peeve everyone - I would like to posit that women don't 'deserve' Sports Illustrated equality because women in general do NOT follow sport as closely as men as evidenced by the lack of attendance at women's sports compared to men. The Women's National Soccer Team has good support, but they are an exception, not the rule.
In sum, kudos to T&FN for 'our' equality, but kudos also to SI for not being so PC as to have equal coverage.
Comment