Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vlasic 205! [6-8 3/4)

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vlasic 205! [6-8 3/4)

    New WL from vlasic. Only one X in the up to 205 and that was on 192!


    Now she goes for 210!

    Can she get her nerves under control she looks like a solid gold medallist in Osaka!

  • #2
    Good 1st effort on 210!
    I say worth 208, looked about the same as when Kajsa and perhaps Tia was in their best shape last year.

    EVEN BETTER in her 2nd! Is it happening tonight!??



    No. decent 3rd effort.

    Comment


    • #3
      I should go back and watch Yelena at 2.10 in Athens, but this looked like the best 2.10m attempt I've ever seen.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by midnightsun
        I should go back and watch Yelena at 2.10 in Athens, but this looked like the best 2.10m attempt I've ever seen.
        The women's high jump record is certainly looking vulnerable and I think this is the 11th competition of the season, indoors and outdoors, that Vlasic has cleared 2m or higher, and could have Henkel's mark of most jumps over 2m in a season in sight.

        Please could you describe her attempt?
        http://twitter.com/Trackside2011

        Comment


        • #5
          a couple of pics for your viewing pleasure 8)

          2.10-1st attempt



          2.10 -2nd attempt

          Comment


          • #6
            Thanks for those pictures

            She looked to have the height on both occasions but probably scraped it off with her calves or ankles.
            http://twitter.com/Trackside2011

            Comment


            • #7
              Watching it in motion instead of a still picture, it appears she has the elevation but her behind falls too soon on to the bar.

              She did touch it with the low part of her bottom first before she did with her calves

              Comment


              • #8
                deleted

                Comment


                • #9
                  we could threaten Croatia with a nuclear bomb if it doesn't agree to stopping giving the world almost-2.10m high jumpers having no athletics tradition worthy of note!
                  Sounds fair to me!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by midnightsun
                    we could threaten Croatia with a nuclear bomb if it doesn't agree to stopping giving the world almost-2.10m high jumpers having no athletics tradition worthy of note!
                    Sounds fair to me!
                    Correct answer Midnightsun!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      So 2.08 is, like, really high, right?? :lol:

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by midnightsun
                        Watching it in motion instead of a still picture, it appears she has the elevation but her behind falls too soon on to the bar.

                        She did touch it with the low part of her bottom first before she did with her calves
                        She i further into the jump in the the first picture. In the second jump it almost looks like she is already bending the bar, maybe she has hit it with her upper back. They are obviously very good attempts. Vlasic definitely look the favorite for Osaka, especially since both Hellebaut and Bergqvist have been struggling.
                        But then there is Slesarenko!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          VIDEO: Blanka jump over 205cm

                          congratulations to Blanka 8)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            i hope she has damn well competed in every possible meet beween march - oct in her whole career, otherwise kajsa & tia will be high-5'ving themselves into a frenzy if she fails to make the podium in osaka

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by bad hammy
                              So 2.08 is, like, really high, right?? :lol:
                              Not really up on my metrics, but my guess is that it's better than 2.05 but not as good as 2.10. :wink:

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X