Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stockholm w400m

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by guru
    Originally posted by eldrick
    is it as impressive as lashawn's
    20.10 to 19.98??
    almost world-class to world class - wouda won '00/'01/'03 globals


    or as jazzy pointed out, bolt's ?[quote:bhflbx74]10.03 from a 19.75 guy??
    [/quote:bhflbx74]


    & his previous 100pb prior to his "19.75" days ?

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by eldrick
      his previous 100pb prior to his "19.75" days ?
      Ahh, now you're changing the rules. If your point is top-end speed improves as well as speed endurance, then, once again, we must compare APPLES TO APPLES. Fact is Bolt IS a 19.75 guy, 10.03 is right in line with that. In fact, I'd say it's a bit slow for a 200 runner of that caliber.

      Tell me why Felix's 100 has not progressed in the same line her 400 has this year, if what you say is true. That is the only comparison that applies to this discussion.
      https://twitter.com/walnuthillstrak

      Comment


      • #48
        he ran 19.75 before he ran 10.03

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by eldrick
          he ran 19.75 before he ran 10.03
          EXACTLY!! :roll:
          https://twitter.com/walnuthillstrak

          Comment


          • #50
            he brought his 19.88pb down to 19.75

            where does that say he MUST bring his 100pb down after ?!

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by eldrick
              he brought his 19.88pb down to 19.75

              where does that say he MUST bring his 100pb down after ?!
              You're making my point.

              Obviously, his speed endurance allowed his 200 to improve, thusly his speed endurance improved at a greater rate that his basic leg speed.
              https://twitter.com/walnuthillstrak

              Comment


              • #52
                not really

                safa's much improved 400 hasn't improved his 200, let alone his 100 ?!

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by eldrick
                  not really

                  safa's much improved 400 hasn't improved his 200, let alone his 100 ?!
                  THAT'S MY POINT! Go back to the start of this tangent.

                  It's easier to improve at the next distance up(see FELIX)than the next distance down.
                  https://twitter.com/walnuthillstrak

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    While Sanya and Allyson are great 1/2/400 runners, they have some way to go in US or world history:

                    US
                    FloJo: 10.49/21.34/48.08R
                    MJones: 10.65/21.62/49.59
                    Gwen Torrence: 10.82/21.72/49.64
                    VB Hooks: 10.99/21.81/48.83

                    Rest:
                    Koch*: 10.83/21.71/47.6
                    Perec: 10.96/21.99/48.25
                    Privalova: 10.77/21.87/49.89 (not to mention 400H Gold)

                    *I think we all know why.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by guru
                      Originally posted by eldrick
                      not really

                      safa's much improved 400 hasn't improved his 200, let alone his 100 ?!
                      THAT'S MY POINT! Go back to the start of this tangent.

                      It's easier to improve at the next distance up(see FELIX)than the next distance down.
                      she's run no better than a gdr 22-flat gal moving up

                      nothing impessive there

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by eldrick
                        it never occured to you that they moved up because they got a serious shit-kicking when they moved down ?
                        So I'll take that as you agreeing that improvement is easier at the next distance up than down(key word being consistent, not a one-off seasonal PR shot)?

                        And certainly easier than for someone who's been running the distance all year?
                        https://twitter.com/walnuthillstrak

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by jeremyp
                          While Sanya and Allyson are great 1/2/400 runners, they have some way to go in US or world history:

                          US
                          FloJo: 10.49/21.34/48.08R
                          MJones: 10.65/21.62/49.59
                          Gwen Torrence: 10.82/21.72/49.64
                          VB Hooks: 10.99/21.81/48.83

                          Rest:
                          Koch*: 10.83/21.71/47.6
                          Perec: 10.96/21.99/48.25
                          Privalova: 10.77/21.87/49.89 (not to mention 400H Gold)

                          *I think we all know why.
                          I don't think it's fair to include a relay time made by anyone. I also think the asterisk and closing remarks are uncalled for.
                          Take good care of yourself.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by jeremyp
                            While Sanya and Allyson are great 1/2/400 runners, they have some way to go in US or world history:

                            US
                            FloJo: 10.49/21.34/48.08R
                            MJones: 10.65/21.62/49.59
                            Gwen Torrence: 10.82/21.72/49.64
                            VB Hooks: 10.99/21.81/48.83

                            Rest:
                            Koch*: 10.83/21.71/47.6
                            Perec: 10.96/21.99/48.25
                            Privalova: 10.77/21.87/49.89 (not to mention 400H Gold)

                            *I think we all know why.
                            The difference is that Sanya and Allison are getting their marks in the same meet. None of the people you've listed have ever done 100/400 doubles to my knowledge.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by gh
                              So the world's two best won't be running the 400 in Osaka. Bummer.
                              I'm assuming they'll both be on the 4x400.

                              That could be interesting, the USA may not even have a single w400 finalist at the WCs but could very well come near WR time in the relay.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by richxx87
                                Originally posted by gh
                                So the world's two best won't be running the 400 in Osaka. Bummer.
                                I'm assuming they'll both be on the 4x400.

                                That could be interesting, the USA may not even have a single w400 finalist at the WCs but could very well come near WR time in the relay.
                                Without two in shape to make the final they will not get close to the WR - you have to average under 49, not under 50.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X