This drives me nuts:
Men's Discus
Fazskas beats Alekna 4-2 in meets, but because of 'honors won', but since Alekna won WC and GP Final, he's #1.
Men's 400
Washington beats Young 4-1 in meets, but Young wins WC and GPF, so Young is #1, right? NO!
Obviously there's a huge difference between a 1-4 record and a 2-4 record.
If you win the two biggest meets of the season and run your SB is the biggest meet of the year, shouldn't the 'honors won' take precedence?
In defense of the Rankers, Washington's record overall WAS much more consistent.
Men's Discus
Fazskas beats Alekna 4-2 in meets, but because of 'honors won', but since Alekna won WC and GP Final, he's #1.
Men's 400
Washington beats Young 4-1 in meets, but Young wins WC and GPF, so Young is #1, right? NO!
Obviously there's a huge difference between a 1-4 record and a 2-4 record.
If you win the two biggest meets of the season and run your SB is the biggest meet of the year, shouldn't the 'honors won' take precedence?
In defense of the Rankers, Washington's record overall WAS much more consistent.
Comment