Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre 110H

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mojo
    replied
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
    Originally posted by bad hammy
    Apparently I'm a dumbass, but didn't know it until cacique pointed it out . . .
    Im a dumbass and a racist but here on this site nobody hardly notices cause were all a bunch of racist dumbass's. :lol:
    I noticed. :twisted:

    I just watched Liu's race and his false start was awfully close and he did go over a couple of hurdles....I am not convinced of a conspiracy though it is very possible.He looked pretty fast though and I just doubt he would have ran like that if he was worried about his hammy.
    He looked so unsure before the race-you could tell he was not thrilled to be out there. The guy has so much pressure on him.... :cry:

    Did Ryan Wilson also FS?

    Leave a comment:


  • SQUACKEE
    replied
    Originally posted by bad hammy
    Apparently I'm a dumbass, but didn't know it until cacique pointed it out . . .
    Im a dumbass and a racist but here on this site nobody hardly notices cause were all a bunch of racist dumbass's. :lol:

    Leave a comment:


  • bad hammy
    replied
    Apparently I'm a dumbass, but didn't know it until cacique pointed it out . . .

    Leave a comment:


  • Daisy
    replied
    Originally posted by cacique
    i guess you can't read english, dear marguerite. did you read this, from above, among others:
    I think you are being over-sensitive. Liu is incredibly popular in an event that is as competitive as they come. Of course more eyes will be on him and more comments too. In that context lonewolfs comments are nothing more than a tongue in check remark that reflects reality. That, though, does not make the comment racially biased.

    And given you lumped all our comments together (or did you intend to use dumbass referring to lonewolf in the singular?).

    Originally posted by cacique
    what's really clear is your anti-chinese bias, you dumbasses.
    Why shouldn't we find your out-of-the-blue charge a bit perplexing? I see nothing here except for support for an atheletes (who happens to be Chinese) unfortunate situation (NIKE wants Liu at the start line).

    Leave a comment:


  • cacique
    replied
    Originally posted by Daisy
    The discussion was relating to whether this was an easy way out for Liu to protect his injury. If anything this discussion relates to the issue of are the Nike athletes forced to run against their best intertests or not? How is that anti-Chinese?
    i guess you can't read english, dear marguerite. did you read this, from above, among others:

    lonewolf Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:57 pm Post subject:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Make that three votes for suspected Chinese false start conspiracy

    Leave a comment:


  • Daisy
    replied
    Originally posted by cacique
    in the women's race, there was a FS and a DQ. all american women. were they in concert too?
    Did they have known injury problems coming into the event? FS happen.

    The discussion was relating to whether this was an easy way out for Liu to protect his injury. If anything this discussion relates to the issue of are the Nike athletes forced to run against their best intertests or not? How is that anti-Chinese?

    Leave a comment:


  • cacique
    replied
    Originally posted by lonewolf
    Can't one be cynical without racial bias?
    really? in the women's race, there was a FS and a DQ. all american women. were they in concert too? nobody raised any conspiracy theories there. but 2 chinese athletes, they must be all in cahoots...

    i rest my case.

    Leave a comment:


  • lonewolf
    replied
    Brian, you have eloquently stated my surmise.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kevin Richardson
    replied
    I have no fear of or prejudices against Chinese. In fact, my thoughts were not in any way perjorative. Spend a little more time on the boards to get to know us before making statements like "dumbasses". Trust me, many of us have merited that on one occasion or another, but not this time.

    I'll give you a mulligan on it, this time.

    And for the recore, I am a HUGE fan of General Tso, whoever the heck he was.

    Leave a comment:


  • gh
    replied
    As it happened, I was't anywhere near the 110H start yesterday, so can't comment directly on that, but I will say that if I were a starter, I'm not sure I've seen a Liu race in person yet (and that' a dozen or so) where I wouldn't pull the gun on him. He comes up late, rocks.... Somewhere along the line, the definition of being steady at the gun came not to apply to him it appears.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brian
    replied
    Originally posted by tandfman
    Originally posted by Daisy
    Is the incentive for athlete to do well high enough at this meet?
    I suspect that for some athletes, it's not a matter of incentives--showing up and competing is something they're required to do by their contract with Nike.

    Bingo!

    Hurt. Got to get out of the country in one piece. But how to do so with a major race owned (for all intents and purposes) by your sponsor in a venue of 14,000 people with major network coverage (read: $) because of the presence of athletes such as yourself.

    False start.

    Why after the countryman instead of simply doing so twice yourself? Because one false start is a mistake, but it happens. Two false starts can represent to some a weakness, real or imagined, to be later exploited at Beijing. Why do anything to lessen the image of superiority and give greater hope of possibly beating you to your opponents?

    The way the announcers were setting it up, I wouldn't be surprised everyone involved--the network, Nike, etc.--were in on the plan.

    And I would bet the plan wasn't Liu's at all, but hatched by the powers that be around him. Maybe all that "nervousness" the announcers talked about was because he is a basically good and honest man not liking the charade he about to be a party to this day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Daisy
    replied
    Originally posted by tandfman
    Originally posted by Daisy
    Is the incentive for athlete to do well high enough at this meet?
    I suspect that for some athletes, it's not a matter of incentives--showing up and competing is something they're required to do by their contract with Nike.
    That is what i was refering too, but didn't do a very good job at making myself clear. Basicaly there is no pay, so their incentive is less. But do NIKE penalise them for not showing up or "trying"?

    On a semi related note, on the Scottish professional circuit the athletes get penalised based on an honest effort rule. If the judge perceives the athletes are not putting in full effort their handicap is adjusted to reflect that lack of effort. That would mean they are then closer to scratch. So part of the game is to make it "look" like they put in full effort on each race.

    Leave a comment:


  • tandfman
    replied
    Originally posted by Daisy
    Is the incentive for athlete to do well high enough at this meet?
    I suspect that for some athletes, it's not a matter of incentives--showing up and competing is something they're required to do by their contract with Nike.

    Leave a comment:


  • lonewolf
    replied
    Can't one be cynical without racial bias?

    Leave a comment:


  • marknhj
    replied
    Originally posted by cacique
    oh yes, liu and shi rehearsed the whole thing beforehand...

    what's really clear is your anti-chinese bias, you dumbasses.
    The only anti-Chinese bias I'm aware of here is Marlow's dislike of Chinese food.

    btw: my sister-in-law is Chinese, so is Daisy's wife...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X