Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

mPV

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mPV

    1 Maston Wallace FR Texas 5.35m 17-06.50 10
    5.10 5.25 5.35 5.45 5.50
    O XO XO PPP XXX
    2 Yavgeniy Olhovsky SO Virginia Tech 5.25m 17-02.75 6.33
    5.10 5.25 5.35
    O O XXX
    2 Nick Frawley SO Air Force 5.25m 17-02.75 6.33
    5.10 5.25 5.35
    O O XXX
    2 Jared O'Connor JR Washington 5.25m 17-02.75 6.33
    5.10 5.25 5.35
    O O XXX
    5 Luke Schoen SO Albany 5.25m 17-02.75 4
    5.10 5.25 5.35
    XO O XXX
    6 Robert Caldwell SR New Mexico 5.25m 17-02.75 3
    5.10 5.25 5.35
    O XO XXX
    7 Jeff Coover JR Indiana 5.25m 17-02.75 2
    5.10 5.25 5.35
    XXO XO XXX
    8 Johnny Quinn FR UCLA 5.10m 16-08.75 0.50
    5.10 5.25
    O XXX
    8 Brian Hancock SO Missouri 5.10m 16-08.75 0.50
    5.10 5.25
    O XXX
    10 Joseph Berry FR Tennessee 5.10m 16-08.75
    5.10 5.25
    XO XXX
    10 Daniel Imlach SR Sacramento State 5.10m 16-08.75
    5.10 5.25
    XO XXX
    10 Spencer McCorkel FR Arkansas 5.10m 16-08.75
    5.10 5.25
    XO XXX
    13 Dustin DeLeo JR UCLA 5.10m 16-08.75
    5.10 5.25
    XXO XXX
    -- Sean Young JR South Florida NH
    5.10
    XXX
    -- Mitch Greeley SR Clemson NH
    5.10 5.25
    PPP XXX

  • #2
    I don't have past results handy, but this looks like the poorest quality NCAA vault final in years.

    Comment


    • #3
      This event sure upset the formcharts. It looks like only 2 of the 8 placers (Wallace and Caldwell) were predicted to place.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Half Miler
        I don't have past results handy, but this looks like the poorest quality NCAA vault final in years.
        Nasty headwind: poor quality marks, but hard to attribute any lack of performance to the athletes themselves.

        Comment


        • #5
          At its current rate of progression the PV will be won at 15 feet in the year 2020.

          Comment


          • #6
            Any updates from the other field events, which were scheduled to start about 2 hours ago, wTJ, wPV and mHJ??

            Or if someone gave us an update would that violate the no-blogging fatwa?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by gh
              Originally posted by Half Miler
              I don't have past results handy, but this looks like the poorest quality NCAA vault final in years.
              Nasty headwind: poor quality marks, but hard to attribute any lack of performance to the athletes themselves.
              UCLA Freshman Johnny Quinn told the UCLA site:
              On the weather conditions
              "This was just an awful wind to vault in. I've never seen it like this during a competition. Normally you can move the pit, but the wind was swirling so whichever direction you decided to vault down, the wind would be all over the place. You can't fix that.... I don't like to blame the wind, but it's very frustrating to compete in wind like we had today."

              Comment


              • #8
                PV

                When is the last time the Men's HJ winner was within 10 feet of the Men's PV winner?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: PV

                  Originally posted by Bob Bettwy
                  When is the last time the Men's HJ winner was within 10 feet of the Men's PV winner?
                  Great question. The answer is 1979, when Nat Page won the HJ at 7-4 1/2 and Paul Pilla won the PV in 17-4 1/4. (Yes, I looked that up--I didn't thnk it was being asked as a trivia question.)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The conditions must have indeed been awful because the women's PV was even worse.

                    On the other hand, in big international meets in big stadiums the wind is often exactly like that, or so they tell me. So it's good preparation for that.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I think it was the quality of athletes. Over the past few years you there were women who could clear heights over 14-10. The quality is different.

                      Originally posted by unclezadok
                      The conditions must have indeed been awful because the women's PV was even worse.

                      On the other hand, in big international meets in big stadiums the wind is often exactly like that, or so they tell me. So it's good preparation for that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X