Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GL Bruxelles w100mH - Delloreen Ennis-London 12.65

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GL Bruxelles w100mH - Delloreen Ennis-London 12.65

    Reïna-Flor Okori FRA
    Danielle Carruthers USA
    Priscilla Lopes-Schliep CAN
    LoLo Jones USA
    Sally McLellan AUS
    Josephine Onyia ESP
    Delloreen Ennis-London JAM
    Sarah Claxton GBR
    Elisabeth Davin BEL

    Start: 20:42 CET

  • #2
    All-time bests at van Damme.

    12.42 Yordanka Donkova BUL 1 05.09.1986
    12.44 Glory Alozie NGR 1 28.08.1998
    12.48 Ginka Zagorcheva BUL 2 05.09.1986
    12.49 Gail Devers USA 1 30.08.2002
    12.51 Ginka Zagorcheva BUL 1h2 05.09.1986
    12.52 Susanna Kallur SWE 1 14.09.2007
    12.53 Gail Devers USA 1 25.08.2000
    12.55 Michelle Perry USA 1 25.08.2006
    12.58 Yordanka Donkova BUL 1h1 05.09.1986
    12.60 Ludmila Engquist SWE 1 23.08.1996

    Comment


    • #3
      Last Olympic-cycle winner: 12,78, Mariya Koroteyeva

      =========================================

      Comment


      • #4
        Ennis-london wins with 12.65 :evil:

        Comment


        • #5
          Doesn't seem to have been affected by the SI article, does she?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by AthleticsInBritain
            Doesn't seem to have been affected by the SI article, does she?
            I'll admit she is mentally pretty tough.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by AthleticsInBritain
              Doesn't seem to have been affected by the SI article, does she?
              Does this mean that the IAAF aren't taking these allegations seriously? Have they proved unreliable? I'm sure athletes have been pulled from recent GL meetings for less. Not saying that she shouldn't have run.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by AthleticsInBritain
                Doesn't seem to have been affected by the SI article, does she?
                Why should she?

                http://tinyurl.com/6dfpgj

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by fez
                  Originally posted by AthleticsInBritain
                  Doesn't seem to have been affected by the SI article, does she?
                  Have they proved unreliable?.
                  Two words - Sports Illustrated.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by malmo
                    Originally posted by fez
                    Originally posted by AthleticsInBritain
                    Doesn't seem to have been affected by the SI article, does she?
                    Have they proved unreliable?.
                    Two words - Sports Illustrated.
                    Surely common sense hasn't prevailed?!! :-)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'd rate SI's credibility on drug cases as about a 4 on a scale of 10. To them any rumor is equivalent to a conviction.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        http://tinyurl.com/6dfpgj



                        I would definitely be thinking lawsuit if I were her, and I know that I'm telling the truth with evidence to back it up. She could put a stop to this polorization of the sport by these tabloid-ish reporting. the motive is disgredit Jamaica's achievements.


                        One Love!
                        One Love!!!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by onlooker
                          the motive is disgredit Jamaica's achievements.
                          I think it's more likely that the motive is to sell magazines. SI has been all over the BALCO scandal and the Mitchell report fallout from the beginning. They're just continuing to follow a profitable path.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I think it's more likely that the motive is to sell magazines. SI has been all over the BALCO scandal and the Mitchell report fallout from the beginning. They're just continuing to follow a profitable path.

                            good point. I never looked at it in that light. I guess i was a little too agry to see it that way.


                            One Love!
                            One Love!!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Angry I meant
                              One Love!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X