Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hart confident Bolt can go sub-43

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hart confident Bolt can go sub-43

    Coach Hart convinced Bolt can go below 43s. The article behind this is on the new British T&F magazine (spikes). But I dont know if it is a conflict of interest for GH to allow me to post the link on this forum (being a rival magazine and all) so I wont attempt to.

  • #2
    Coach is really going out on a limb, eh? :wink:

    I don't believe there are problems posting links or even quotes here. Just don't post entire articles.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'ts also in the Jamaican Gleaner.

      http://www.jamaicagleaner.com/gleaner/2 ... orts3.html

      No surprise there. I think just about everyone is convinced that he should be able to go sub 43 given his recent form and talent.



      One Love!
      One Love!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Hart confident Bolt can go sub-43

        Originally posted by Paul Henry
        Coach Hart convinced Bolt can go below 43s.
        Boring! The burning question is whether he thinks JW can go sub-1:40!!! :twisted:

        Comment


        • #5
          In the Jamaican version (have not read the originally mentioned article), Hart
          calculates 400m potential by doubling a 200m time and adding 3.5 seconds. If
          that rule is true, the 400m WR is very weak. (Any 19.74 200m-runner would have
          the capacity to break 43s.) There is good reason to remain sceptical; in
          particular, as it does not differ between 100/200 and 200/400 runners.

          It is conceivable that this rule would hold roughly for 400m specialists, but
          if so it cannot be extended to non-specialist without modifications.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by imaginative
            In the Jamaican version (have not read the originally mentioned article), Hart
            calculates 400m potential by doubling a 200m time and adding 3.5 seconds. If
            that rule is true, the 400m WR is very weak. (Any 19.74 200m-runner would have
            the capacity to break 43s.) There is good reason to remain sceptical; in
            particular, as it does not differ between 100/200 and 200/400 runners.
            I wonder why he said 3.5 and not 4.5, as the 4.5 lines up much better with his own protege MJ (using 4.5 gives 43.14 for him).

            Then again, using 3.5 lines up well for JW.

            Maybe 3.5 works well for the 400 specialist who occasionally tries the 200m (JW, LM), while 4.5 works for a 100/200 guy or 200/400 guy who has put in some years of dedicated training for the 200.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by imaginative
              In the Jamaican version (have not read the originally mentioned article), Hart
              calculates 400m potential by doubling a 200m time and adding 3.5 seconds. If
              that rule is true, the 400m WR is very weak. (Any 19.74 200m-runner would have
              the capacity to break 43s.) There is good reason to remain sceptical; in
              particular, as it does not differ between 100/200 and 200/400 runners.

              It is conceivable that this rule would hold roughly for 400m specialists, but
              if so it cannot be extended to non-specialist without modifications.
              Well he did qualify it by saying; once the athlete is willing to dedicate himself to the task. Noting the obvious extraneous work involved.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by sprintblox
                Originally posted by imaginative
                In the Jamaican version (have not read the originally mentioned article), Hart
                calculates 400m potential by doubling a 200m time and adding 3.5 seconds. If
                that rule is true, the 400m WR is very weak. (Any 19.74 200m-runner would have
                the capacity to break 43s.) There is good reason to remain sceptical; in
                particular, as it does not differ between 100/200 and 200/400 runners.
                I wonder why he said 3.5 and not 4.5, as the 4.5 lines up much better with his own protege MJ (using 4.5 gives 43.14 for him).

                Then again, using 3.5 lines up well for JW.

                Maybe 3.5 works well for the 400 specialist who occasionally tries the 200m (JW, LM), while 4.5 works for a 100/200 guy or 200/400 guy who has put in some years of dedicated training for the 200.
                With all due respect to coach Hart, this appears to be the silliest formula ever. For Andrew Rock, it's close to 3, perhaps even below (I am not certain of his 200 PR, but it's not far below 21).
                When you need separate formula for each athlete, it's not a formula at all.
                "A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
                by Thomas Henry Huxley

                Comment


                • #9
                  Wasn't Hart on record with the same prediction regarding JW ? It sounds like Hart has sent his CV to Bolt's agent.
                  ... nothing really ever changes my friend, new lines for old, new lines for old.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    FWIW, if you take 19.30 and apply the ratio of Bolt's 200/400 times when he was 16 years old, you get 43.48.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Ain't no way. Makes you wonder if Jeremy didn't indeed make a good decision to move on from this guy.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Have to smile at imaginative's declaration that "any 19.74" sprinter could break 43 by Hart's formula.... sounds as if 19.74 is sort of a throw away mark !

                        19.74 Land is a pretty exclusive piece of real estate: Bolt, Johnson, Gay, Carter, Spearmon, Fredericks, Dix, Mennea, Marsh... (anyone left out?)

                        Me, I'd discount Marsh,Mennea, Dix, Spearmon and Gay. I just have a baseless hunch that they wouldn't do well over 400 meters. But Fredericks and X-Man and Bolt? I'd guess if they were willing to pay the price of preparing properly they'd have had a shot at 43. Of course for Carter, well, he might be paying the price for other things instead.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Have to smile at imaginative's declaration that "any 19.74" sprinter could break 43 by Hart's formula.... sounds as if 19.74 is sort of a throw away mark !

                          19.74 Land is a pretty exclusive piece of real estate: Bolt, Johnson, Gay, Carter, Spearmon, Fredericks, Dix, Mennea, Marsh... (anyone left out?)

                          Me, I'd discount Marsh,Mennea, Dix, Spearmon and Gay. I just have a baseless hunch that they wouldn't do well over 400 meters. But Fredericks and X-Man and Bolt? I'd guess if they were willing to pay the price of preparing properly they'd have had a shot at 43. Of course for Carter, well, he might be paying the price for other things instead.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Hart confident Bolt can go sub-43

                            Originally posted by Marlow
                            Originally posted by Paul Henry
                            Coach Hart convinced Bolt can go below 43s.
                            Boring! The burning question is whether he thinks JW can go sub-1:40!!! :twisted:
                            Let's see a sub 1:43 first, and we can then take it from there.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by jhc68
                              Me, I'd discount Marsh,Mennea, Dix, Spearmon and Gay. I just have a baseless hunch that they wouldn't do well over 400 meters.
                              Spearmon has a good 400 (45.22). Don't count him out yet. I think he could be even better at 400 than he has been in the 200.
                              But Fredericks and X-Man and Bolt? I'd guess if they were willing to pay the price of preparing properly they'd have had a shot at 43. Of course for Carter, well, he might be paying the price for other things instead.
                              We're talking about below 43, not 43.xx. If MJ couldn't do it, Fredericks wouldn't either. Bolt and X-Man still have a lot of untapped potential, so we'll have to wait and see. They may break 43, or they may end up never running another serious 400 in their life.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X