Coach Hart convinced Bolt can go below 43s. The article behind this is on the new British T&F magazine (spikes). But I dont know if it is a conflict of interest for GH to allow me to post the link on this forum (being a rival magazine and all) so I wont attempt to.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hart confident Bolt can go sub-43
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
I'ts also in the Jamaican Gleaner.
http://www.jamaicagleaner.com/gleaner/2 ... orts3.html
No surprise there. I think just about everyone is convinced that he should be able to go sub 43 given his recent form and talent.
One Love!One Love!!!
Comment
-
In the Jamaican version (have not read the originally mentioned article), Hart
calculates 400m potential by doubling a 200m time and adding 3.5 seconds. If
that rule is true, the 400m WR is very weak. (Any 19.74 200m-runner would have
the capacity to break 43s.) There is good reason to remain sceptical; in
particular, as it does not differ between 100/200 and 200/400 runners.
It is conceivable that this rule would hold roughly for 400m specialists, but
if so it cannot be extended to non-specialist without modifications.
Comment
-
Originally posted by imaginativeIn the Jamaican version (have not read the originally mentioned article), Hart
calculates 400m potential by doubling a 200m time and adding 3.5 seconds. If
that rule is true, the 400m WR is very weak. (Any 19.74 200m-runner would have
the capacity to break 43s.) There is good reason to remain sceptical; in
particular, as it does not differ between 100/200 and 200/400 runners.
Then again, using 3.5 lines up well for JW.
Maybe 3.5 works well for the 400 specialist who occasionally tries the 200m (JW, LM), while 4.5 works for a 100/200 guy or 200/400 guy who has put in some years of dedicated training for the 200.
Comment
-
Originally posted by imaginativeIn the Jamaican version (have not read the originally mentioned article), Hart
calculates 400m potential by doubling a 200m time and adding 3.5 seconds. If
that rule is true, the 400m WR is very weak. (Any 19.74 200m-runner would have
the capacity to break 43s.) There is good reason to remain sceptical; in
particular, as it does not differ between 100/200 and 200/400 runners.
It is conceivable that this rule would hold roughly for 400m specialists, but
if so it cannot be extended to non-specialist without modifications.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sprintbloxOriginally posted by imaginativeIn the Jamaican version (have not read the originally mentioned article), Hart
calculates 400m potential by doubling a 200m time and adding 3.5 seconds. If
that rule is true, the 400m WR is very weak. (Any 19.74 200m-runner would have
the capacity to break 43s.) There is good reason to remain sceptical; in
particular, as it does not differ between 100/200 and 200/400 runners.
Then again, using 3.5 lines up well for JW.
Maybe 3.5 works well for the 400 specialist who occasionally tries the 200m (JW, LM), while 4.5 works for a 100/200 guy or 200/400 guy who has put in some years of dedicated training for the 200.
When you need separate formula for each athlete, it's not a formula at all."A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
by Thomas Henry Huxley
Comment
-
Have to smile at imaginative's declaration that "any 19.74" sprinter could break 43 by Hart's formula.... sounds as if 19.74 is sort of a throw away mark !
19.74 Land is a pretty exclusive piece of real estate: Bolt, Johnson, Gay, Carter, Spearmon, Fredericks, Dix, Mennea, Marsh... (anyone left out?)
Me, I'd discount Marsh,Mennea, Dix, Spearmon and Gay. I just have a baseless hunch that they wouldn't do well over 400 meters. But Fredericks and X-Man and Bolt? I'd guess if they were willing to pay the price of preparing properly they'd have had a shot at 43. Of course for Carter, well, he might be paying the price for other things instead.
Comment
-
Have to smile at imaginative's declaration that "any 19.74" sprinter could break 43 by Hart's formula.... sounds as if 19.74 is sort of a throw away mark !
19.74 Land is a pretty exclusive piece of real estate: Bolt, Johnson, Gay, Carter, Spearmon, Fredericks, Dix, Mennea, Marsh... (anyone left out?)
Me, I'd discount Marsh,Mennea, Dix, Spearmon and Gay. I just have a baseless hunch that they wouldn't do well over 400 meters. But Fredericks and X-Man and Bolt? I'd guess if they were willing to pay the price of preparing properly they'd have had a shot at 43. Of course for Carter, well, he might be paying the price for other things instead.
Comment
-
Re: Hart confident Bolt can go sub-43
Originally posted by MarlowOriginally posted by Paul HenryCoach Hart convinced Bolt can go below 43s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jhc68Me, I'd discount Marsh,Mennea, Dix, Spearmon and Gay. I just have a baseless hunch that they wouldn't do well over 400 meters.
But Fredericks and X-Man and Bolt? I'd guess if they were willing to pay the price of preparing properly they'd have had a shot at 43. Of course for Carter, well, he might be paying the price for other things instead.
Comment
Comment