Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michael Johnson's Beijing Analysis & A Look At 2012

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Michael Johnson's Beijing Analysis & A Look At 2012

    Johnson writes:

    "Tyson Gay, Allison Felix, Sanya Richards, Asafa Powell and Blanca Vlasic all established themselves as the best in the world after Athens 2004, dominated their events and gave themselves the opportunity to become individual Olympic champions. They all failed in Beijing, and that was not good for the sport."

    Interesting. There is another dominating US athlete he failed to mentioned!

  • #2
    Re: Michael Johnson's Beijing Analysis & A Look At 2012

    Originally posted by ILoveTrack
    Johnson writes:

    "Tyson Gay, Allison Felix, Sanya Richards, Asafa Powell and Blanca Vlasic all established themselves as the best in the world after Athens 2004, dominated their events and gave themselves the opportunity to become individual Olympic champions. They all failed in Beijing, and that was not good for the sport."

    Interesting. There is another dominating US athlete he failed to mentioned!
    Probably because JW is an Olympic champion.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Michael Johnson's Beijing Analysis & A Look At 2012

      Originally posted by ILoveTrack
      They all failed in Beijing, and that was not good for the sport."
      Why is that bad for the sport exactly? Sport becomes boring when it's predictable.
      http://twitter.com/Trackside2011

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Michael Johnson's Beijing Analysis & A Look At 2012

        Originally posted by nevetsllim
        Originally posted by ILoveTrack
        They all failed in Beijing, and that was not good for the sport."
        Why is that bad for the sport exactly? Sport becomes boring when it's predictable.
        I'd have to agree. Plus, if we've learned anything over the years, its exactly that the "best" athlete doesn't always win--underdogs are always appearing out of left field. I reserve the right to immediately dismiss the significance of some of these gold medalists, but I'd never pretend that this process is "bad for the sport."

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm pretty much of that mind as well, but I've found it interesting to hear repeatedly over the last few years that at least in terms of the big team sports that having dynasties is very good for the sport, and that while "on any given Sunday" is a good theory, it's still better if you have a monolith that just about everybody can relate to.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by gh
            I'm pretty much of that mind as well, but I've found it interesting to hear repeatedly over the last few years that at least in terms of the big team sports that having dynasties is very good for the sport, and that while "on any given Sunday" is a good theory, it's still better if you have a monolith that just about everybody can relate to.
            I do like variety in my elite T&F, but the people who have always captured my magination were the Moses and Lewises and Bubkas that dominated their events. We need 'dynasties' to attract the casual fan. Michael Phelps MADE swimming at the OG.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Marlow
              Originally posted by gh
              I'm pretty much of that mind as well, but I've found it interesting to hear repeatedly over the last few years that at least in terms of the big team sports that having dynasties is very good for the sport, and that while "on any given Sunday" is a good theory, it's still better if you have a monolith that just about everybody can relate to.
              I do like variety in my elite T&F, but the people who have always captured my magination were the Moses and Lewises and Bubkas that dominated their events. We need 'dynasties' to attract the casual fan. Michael Phelps MADE swimming at the OG.
              And we had Bolt and Isinbayeva.

              or does "we" mean mean you? :P

              Comment


              • #8
                Actually, in terms of public & media interest/attention, I'd have to say that I agree with gh above. The public does like "known quantities"--if they tune in to see, say, Jeremy Wariner win, then they're let down if he doesn't. My original comment was geared more toward the intrinsic dynamics of the sport itself--there will always be newcomers, upsets, and surprises. And sometimes those newcomers go on to establish dynasties of their own. Who was that near-unknown who won the 400H in Montreal??

                Comment


                • #9
                  People are basically king/icon/hero seekers. It is in human nature to worship and adore. It is the same in other arenas, why does hollywood pay 50million to get mr verywellknown when they could get a better actress for 1/100th that.. .. people have limited attention to devout to anything and the human mind is very well suited to keeping a single human face and personality in its virtual rolodex. Track needs at least a small stable of well known big performers. Where is King Carl when we need him!!
                  ... nothing really ever changes my friend, new lines for old, new lines for old.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Michael Johnson's Beijing Analysis & A Look At 2012

                    Originally posted by skyin' brian
                    Originally posted by ILoveTrack
                    Johnson writes:

                    "Tyson Gay, Allison Felix, Sanya Richards, Asafa Powell and Blanca Vlasic all established themselves as the best in the world after Athens 2004, dominated their events and gave themselves the opportunity to become individual Olympic champions. They all failed in Beijing, and that was not good for the sport."

                    Interesting. There is another dominating US athlete he failed to mentioned!
                    Probably because JW is an Olympic champion.
                    True. Maybe he should have included him and mentioned that among this group JW was the greatest failure in Beijing (smile).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Michael Johnson's Beijing Analysis & A Look At 2012

                      Originally posted by ILoveTrack
                      Originally posted by skyin' brian
                      Originally posted by ILoveTrack
                      Johnson writes:

                      "Tyson Gay, Allison Felix, Sanya Richards, Asafa Powell and Blanca Vlasic all established themselves as the best in the world after Athens 2004, dominated their events and gave themselves the opportunity to become individual Olympic champions. They all failed in Beijing, and that was not good for the sport."

                      Interesting. There is another dominating US athlete he failed to mentioned!
                      Probably because JW is an Olympic champion.
                      True. Maybe he should have included him and mentioned that among this group JW was the greatest failure in Beijing (smile).
                      The statement was "AFTER the 2004 ..." JW does NOT belong in that set and cannot belong in it. Those great athletes did not win gold medals (except for AF/SR in the 4x400).

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        How can he mention Gay and Powell in that context at the same time?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          but at leasy USA won the womens hammer :shock: :? :? :shock:
                          i deserve extra credit

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by mump boy
                            but at leasy USA won the womens hammer :shock: :? :? :shock:
                            Oh, really? :roll:

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by tandfman
                              Originally posted by mump boy
                              but at leasy USA won the womens hammer :shock: :? :? :shock:
                              Oh, really? :roll:
                              Maybe MJ doesn't know the difference between a Hammer and a Discus ?!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X