If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Apply Ockham's Razor to any number of variables here.
Wouldn't the OR response be that in a nation of 1,200,000,000, we should EXPECT someone to be that good? Outliers in that population, even at 16yo, should be there.
Apply Ockham's Razor to any number of variables here.
Wouldn't the OR response be that in a nation of 1,200,000,000, we should EXPECT someone to be that good? Outliers in that population, even at 16yo, should be there.
Sure, and it would be more likely that the outliers would show themselves at age 21,22, 23, etc. but they haven't.
Isn:t the Razor:s test meant to establish priorities among two theories?
Yes, the theory that the ages are correct, versus the one that they aren't.
I would have applied it to the theory that the course was of correct length and not downhill, versus the course's missing one of those essential elements. In fact, I thought that's what you were referring to.
Sure, and it would be more likely that the outliers would show themselves at age 21,22, 23, etc. but they haven't.
Not if he is the vanguard of a new wave of distance talent being systematically nurtured. He with the most talent will appear first, not just the ones with talent and experience/maturity. We all keep waiting for the Sleeping Giant to awaken (Liu notwithstanding), but when we have evidence he might be, we question it? (Not that the ladies of '93 don't give us pause)
Almost a whole minute slower than the "age 16 record" of 61:35 by Faustin Baha Sulle(Tnz) . If only there were a reliable test (like "carbon dating") for age. Age records are an important (statistical) aspect of the whole sport, but there really have to be two listings in most of the running events - the "record", and the "verified" record. Why not... there's room for two.....
Comment