Tweet
For background on the criteria, see the m800 or mPV thread. There’s definitely rewards to going head-to-head against the best and throwing far.
First we round up the usual suspects based on marks. They are Hoffa, Cantwell, Nelson, Mikhnevich, Majewski, Armstrong, Luzhyn, Taylor and Smith.
Then we rank the meets that have the best fields and best performances. There’s not a lot there.
1. OG
2. WAF
3. London
4. Szczecin
5. Oly Trials (for Amis)
The top 6 come into focus
1. Majewski – OG 1, WAF 1, Szcz 2, London 3 – two biggest wins of the year
2. Cantwell – OG 2, Szcz 1, WAF 2, OT 2, London 4 – so close
3. Hoffa – OG 7, London 1, OT 1, WAF 4 – Oly let-down
4. Mikhnevich – OG 3, Szcz 5 – not much after OG
5. Nelson – London 2, OT 3 – Oly bust
6. Taylor – WAF 3, OT 4, London 7
Probable next two, but insufficient comps
7. Armstrong – OG 4
8. Lyzhyn – OG 5
First we round up the usual suspects based on marks. They are Hoffa, Cantwell, Nelson, Mikhnevich, Majewski, Armstrong, Luzhyn, Taylor and Smith.
Then we rank the meets that have the best fields and best performances. There’s not a lot there.
1. OG
2. WAF
3. London
4. Szczecin
5. Oly Trials (for Amis)
The top 6 come into focus
1. Majewski – OG 1, WAF 1, Szcz 2, London 3 – two biggest wins of the year
2. Cantwell – OG 2, Szcz 1, WAF 2, OT 2, London 4 – so close
3. Hoffa – OG 7, London 1, OT 1, WAF 4 – Oly let-down
4. Mikhnevich – OG 3, Szcz 5 – not much after OG
5. Nelson – London 2, OT 3 – Oly bust
6. Taylor – WAF 3, OT 4, London 7
Probable next two, but insufficient comps
7. Armstrong – OG 4
8. Lyzhyn – OG 5
Comment