Prefontaine had it, Mary Decker Slaney had it,Said Aouita,being able to race.It didnt make a difference if the pace wa fast or slow.I believe you can be taught great racing tatics,but it helps if you are taught at a young age about competition and competing.The africans are masters at this.They each take turns until the best man wins.German seems to have good racing chops also.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The art of racing
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Re: The art of racing
Originally posted by williamwindhamjrPrefontaine had it
As to pure racing, I always liked to watch Ovett, especially if he got boxed in.
Another great racer was Alberto Cova who always seemed to time his races right.
-
Originally posted by williamwindhamjrVery few runners can run up front from start to finnish
Originally posted by williamwindhamjrIt is harder I think to run from the front because you are setting the pace,.......but it is an art in itself if you can.
Comment
-
Originally posted by williamwindhamjrThis is called the track and field forum,not the idiot forum BC.German does have good racing skills or did you not see the Big 12 race where he ran 3:55 and second place was 4:05 or the USA XC trials.
However, I'm curious to hear which racing skills you feel German demonstrated with his Big 12 victory. To me it seems he could simply run ten seconds faster than the second guy, so did. Am I missing something?
Comment
-
Originally posted by williamwindhamjrThis is called the track and field forum,not the idiot forum BC.German does have good racing skills or did you not see the Big 12 race where he ran 3:55 and second place was 4:05 or the USA XC trials.
No I didn't "see" the race. But I know that winning a race by nearly 10 seconds means you're a stud, it doesn't mean you've got incredible race savvy yet.
I also know that seemingly well over half of your posts refer in some manner to German, and his 3:55 thus the crush comment.
If that makes me an idiot well, then so be it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by williamwindhamjrThis is called the track and field forum,not the idiot forum BC.German does have good racing skills or did you not see the Big 12 race where he ran 3:55 and second place was 4:05 or the USA XC trials.
Comment
-
To me the "art" of racing has to do with your skills. Herb Elliot had no "art." He simply went out fast and dared anyone to cach him. Similarly ElG took off with 6-700 m to go and dared anyone to keep up. No "art" there: simply raw power.
Then you have someone like Borzakovsky who has little "art" but a lot of wasted talent. If he would learn to stay in 3d or fourth until 100 out he would win more races. Kipketer, on the other hand, had the power to lead early and was too strong to be caught.
The 800/1500 races are the races in which tactics are most important. Knowing when to kick, knowing how to stay out of being blocked, running your strength. But it's when runners are evenly skilled that "art" comes in. When Lagat ran 2d. to ElG forever, he was simply not quite as strong, and no amount of "art" would have helped him. Until 2004! When he was finally equal to him and -according to him - started his kick in the OG jst a little too early.
Pre had no "art." Against US runners he was simply too strong, and against the best of the rest, he wasn't strong enough.
Comment
-
Re: The art of racing
Originally posted by williamwindhamjrPrefontaine had it, Mary Decker Slaney had it,Said Aouita,being able to race.It didnt make a difference if the pace wa fast or slow.I believe you can be taught great racing tatics,but it helps if you are taught at a young age about competition and competing.The africans are masters at this.They each take turns until the best man wins.German seems to have good racing chops also.
Perhaps most illustrative is the 1959 race in Brisbane against Merv Lincoln. Elliott smoked on the bus out to stadium, was seemingly not fit, but yet again destroyed Lincoln in the final stages. It would appear this defeat was the final psychological blow to Lincoln. Question: How great would Lincoln have been, if Elliott had not been around at the same time?
Comment
Comment