Originally posted by Atanvarno
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ioc confirms ramzi cheated
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mump boyi've said it time and time again why don't the IAAf just ask us who the cheats are
sometimes it is sooooooooooooooo obvious :shock:The fool has said...there is no God. Psa 14
Comment
-
Originally posted by TrackDaddyBecause the first name out of people's mouths (keyboards) when this came up seemed to be Bolt, not Ramzi?
Comment
-
Mump wasn't saying he thought it was RR from the press leak, more that a lot of people suspected him a while ago. I'm sure Mump and I have very similar views on who is and who isn't clean. We should work for WADA8-)
RR prepped like Ayhan. And he had the audacity to get on his knees and pray to Allah (PBUH) post-race. He should be grateful Allah (PBUH) didn't send a thunder bolt down and frazzle him.
Comment
-
My understanding of Steriod is that the drug is anti-inflamatory. This aid athletic performance because when athletes train they break blood vessels. Usually resting and giving the body time to heal was the only solution to this problem.
When artificially produced steriods are added to the body's own naturally
produced steriods, athletes can recovery faster from training and can therefore train harder with less rest.
How exactly is this "cheating"?
Furthermore, I also understand that the Germans first synthesized artificial steriods in the 1940s and the East Germans perfected the training regimen and discovered that the injectable form of steriods avioided the side effects to the liver and kidneys that was a problem with the capsules.
Does this mean that we have to throw out all the records set between 1945 and when the testing protocols began. since there is no way to prove that they weren't the result of 'cheating'?
Comment
-
Originally posted by TrackDaddyOriginally posted by mump boyi've said it time and time again why don't the IAAf just ask us who the cheats are
sometimes it is sooooooooooooooo obvious :shock:
Comment
-
Originally posted by cornstarchwilsonMy understanding of Steriod is that the drug is anti-inflamatory. This aid athletic performance because when athletes train they break blood vessels. Usually resting and giving the body time to heal was the only solution to this problem.
When artificially produced steriods are added to the body's own naturally
produced steriods, athletes can recovery faster from training and can therefore train harder with less rest.
How exactly is this "cheating"?
Furthermore, I also understand that the Germans first synthesized artificial steriods in the 1940s and the East Germans perfected the training regimen and discovered that the injectable form of steriods avioided the side effects to the liver and kidneys that was a problem with the capsules.
Does this mean that we have to throw out all the records set between 1945 and when the testing protocols began. since there is no way to prove that they weren't the result of 'cheating'?
Comment
-
Originally posted by TrackDaddyOriginally posted by mump boyi've said it time and time again why don't the IAAf just ask us who the cheats are
sometimes it is sooooooooooooooo obvious :shock:
Comment
-
Originally posted by scoeWth a bit of luck we will all be spared the prolonged deceit, lies and denials of certain infamous Olympic Gold medal sprinters
People seem to care more when sprinters test positive.
Maybe its because those events are more popular with the casual fan.The fool has said...there is no God. Psa 14
Comment
Comment