Kenenisa Bekele has a combined score of 3821 in the three disciplines. [3:32.35 (1211), 12:37.35 (1304), 26:17.53 (1306)]. This puts him right between MJ's 3817 and Bolt's 3833. Is this a fair way to compare a sprinter's overall ability to a distance runner's ability? Or should we being talking 1500/5000/Marathon?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1500/5000/10,000 Combo Distance Runners
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dakotaI wonder what a list would look like in which athletes can use any three championship events. Carl Lewis would be near the top I suspect. Actually, why not include men and women.
Comment
-
The greater issue is not what distances are used, but whether the points
awarded are fair: As has been discussed on many threads here, the point tables
are too crude a tool by far to give more than approximate results.
Without going through the leg-work, I suspect that there are some even higher
women's scores, when looking at arbitrary events: Koch, Krato, Flo-Jo (at least
with her 400r), Drechsler, JJK?
Comment
-
Good stats on the distance points.
I believe the fairest representation of the two groups' abilities is to take the distance races which have been near the same pace from the start to the finish. The 100m sprinters don't have the luxury of speeding up in the fifth 20m segment of a race because they are not on pace to strike at the world-record, because it becomes physically impossible to achieve a split required to do that so late into a race. Moreover, they don't have a pacer involved to set up ther races. The distance runner, on the other hand, can - and often does - challenge for records the final entire lap to 1.000m, and most of the time following a rabbit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EPelleDaniel Komen (3.836 points) would have appeared to have been the head of the class had the 1.500m (1.251/3.29,46), non-OG distance 3.000m (1.300/7.20,67) and 5.000m (1.285/12.39,74) been considered.
Comment
-
When I first started reading T&FN in the mid-'60s everything was scored on the Portuguese Tables. They were first published in '49 and there was a '62 update.
Their usefulness ended with technological advances like synthetic tracks, auto timing, fiberglass poles and the flop (to say nothing of roids), all of which sent various events off on different tangents.
Comment
-
Originally posted by imaginativeThe greater issue is not what distances are used, but whether the points
awarded are fair: As has been discussed on many threads here, the point tables
are too crude a tool by far to give more than approximate results.
Without going through the leg-work, I suspect that there are some even higher
women's scores, when looking at arbitrary events: Koch, Krato, Flo-Jo (at least
with her 400r), Drechsler, JJK?
7.49 = 1312
7,291 = 1350
22.30 = 1207
Total = 3869
Drechsler rather surprisingly get's her top score from the same 3 events, rather than 100/200/LJ as you'd expect:
7.48 = 1309
21.71 = 1254
6,741 = 1241
Total = 3804
Her 10.91 100m equates to 1213. If this were a heptathlon her 7.63 (2.1) LJ would count, meaning she'd get another 81 pts, total 3885.
The shock is Koch, who doesnt get over 3,800 pts:
10.83 = 1227
21.71 = 1254
47.60 = 1286
Total = 3767
That 400m score is way too low IMO
Comment
Comment