NCAA MEN'S 400M

[dal4018]

I saw the Big XII Championships and Texas Tech soph sensation Gil Roberts won with what was said to be a world leading time of 44.68 he's my pick to take the men's title.

[3a]

I'm more impressed with Michael Bingham.

[dal4018]

I'm more impressed with Michael Bingham.

I guess you would be after all he's the current indoor king for this event.Any darkhorses that could sneak up and pull an upset in your opinion?I have one and he's a serious longshot:Allodin Fothergill of Maryland Eastern Shore his last two races were under 46 and he just made it to the nationals.

[ndamix]

I believe it won't be a shoe-in for anyone trying to win as the competitors come into the meet very close together.

[3a]

I believe it won't be a shoe-in for anyone trying to win as the competitors come into the meet very close together.

We can pretty much guarantee that, right?

The NCAA 400 never fails to be a highlight. There's always an athlete or two that manages to improve their PB by half a second. I just have a sneaking feeling that Bingham will end this NCAA year with a 44.5/6 PB.

[dal4018]

I believe it won't be a shoe-in for anyone trying to win as the competitors come into the meet very close together.

We can pretty much guarantee that, right?

The NCAA 400 never fails to be a highlight. There's always an athlete or two that manages to improve their PB by half a second. I just have a sneaking feeling that Bingham will end this NCAA year with a 44.5/6 PB.

Can't wait for both the men and women's races will be very exciting to say the least.

[Speedfirst]

Calvin Smith Jr.

[NumberCruncher]

I believe it won't be a shoe-in for anyone trying to win as the competitors come into the meet very close together.

We can pretty much guarantee that, right?

The NCAA 400 never fails to be a highlight. There's always an athlete or two that manages to improve their PB by half a second. I just have a sneaking feeling that Bingham will end this NCAA year with a 44.5/6 PB.

QFT

[proofs in the pudd'in]

I noticed that on the IAAF stats that Gil Roberts has a 44.86 on the same day that http://www.alltime-athletics.com/m_400ok.htm has him at a 44.68. What's up with this???? Who is right????

[Dutra]

I noticed that on the IAAF stats that Gil Roberts has a 44.86 on the same day that http://www.alltime-athletics.com/m_400ok.htm has him at a 44.68. What's up with this???? Who is right????

44.86

[proofs in the pudd'in]

I noticed that on the IAAF stats that Gil Roberts has a 44.86 on the same day that http://www.alltime-athletics.com/m_400ok.htm has him at a 44.68. What's up with this???? Who is right????

44.86

So does that change the OPs intial remarks about him being the favorite?

[Dutra]

[quote=proofs in the pudd'in]

http://www.alltime-athletics.com/m_400ok.htm[/url] has him at a 44.68. What's up with this???? Who is right????

44.86

So does that change the OPs intial remarks about him being the favorite?[/quote:18ip537k]

You'd have to ask that poster. There's probably 4-5 guys at a minimum with a real shot at winning.

[proofs in the pudd'in]

[quote=Dutra]

http://www.alltime-athletics.com/m_400ok.htm[/url] has him at a 44.68. What's up with this???? Who is right????

44.86

So does that change the OPs intial remarks about him being the favorite?

You'd have to ask that poster. There's probably 4-5 guys at a minimum with a real shot at winning.[/quote:3rscgx2f]

Yep, if that is the case then that .20 will really matter. Any list of the other guys times goin in?

[proofs in the pudd'in]

never mind got it.

[Bruce Kritzler]

I noticed that on the IAAF stats that Gil Roberts has a 44.86 on the same day that http://www.alltime-athletics.com/m_400ok.htm has him at a 44.68. What's up with this???? Who is right????

Altitude adjustment?