I wouldn't think of giving you a break. Carter is certainly ahead of 10,21, and he's demonstrated he can hold 42,57 pace through 300m of a 400m. If Carter has the potential of running 19,88, and is both faster at 100m and 300m than Johnson, Carter should run under 44,50 without a shadow of a doubt. Where did you get sub-44,00?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2009 USATF: m400 - LaShawn Merritt 44.50
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by EPelleLest one not forget, he also ran 3/4 of his race distance at 42,57 pace. In a one-off on his current form, he could likely surpass 44,53 with relative ease.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EPelleI wouldn't think of giving you a break. Carter is certainly ahead of 10,21, and he's demonstrated he can hold 42,57 pace through 300m of a 400m. If Carter has the potential of running 19,88, and is both faster at 100m and 300m than Johnson, Carter should run under 44,50 without a shadow of a doubt. Where did you get sub-44,00?
Comment
-
Originally posted by 2 centsLest one not forget, in 1990 Roberto Hernandez ran 3/4 of his race distance at 41.97 pace in running a 31.48. That same year his best 400 was his lifetime best of 44.14. Yet you think Carter can run under 44.53 with "relative ease." What a joke.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 2 centsSo by your silly reasoning, since Carter ran faster than Quincy Watts for 300 in a given year, you think he could beat Quincy's 400 for that year. Don't you understand, that 300 for MJ was an easy victory. I don't think anybody was within a second of him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 2 centsI am sorry Epelle, I cannot continue these exchanges with you. It is futile. Your last post makes no sense at all. Maybe somebody could interpret it into some semblance of coherence for me.
edit: "He has no chance of running a 44.53." Really? I believe there are some parametres established to demonstrate that he has some chance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EPelleIt isn't difficult: Hernandez ran 20,60 to Carter's 20,27 the same season both ran their nearest 300m times, dvs 31,93 to 32,07. Hernandez also ran 44,58 that season. Since you're comparing Hernandez, is Carter faster at either 200m or 300m? Or both? Would that not categorically put him in contention to run as fast as 44,58, or the time Hernandez, who was both slower at half the distance and at 300m, achieved?
X was 0.33 ahead of H in the 200.
X was 0.14 ahead of H in the 300.
Effectively, he lost 0.19 going from 200 to 300, which implies that he will
likely lose _at least_ another 0.19 (possibly noticeably more) going from 300
to 400. In other words, he should be _at least_ 0.05 behind H at 400, which
puts him at 44.63+.
(Note that 44.63+ does not necessarily reflect my opinion of X's ability, just
what comes out from this particular line of reasoning. Further note that I may
well have misunderstood your intentions.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by imaginativeEffectively, he lost 0.19 going from 200 to 300, which implies that he will likely lose _at least_ another 0.19 (possibly noticeably more) going from 300 to 400. In other words, he should be _at least_ 0.05 behind H at 400, which puts him at 44.63+.
Comment
Comment