Originally posted by Bruce Kritzler
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2009 USATF: m100 - Michael Rodgers 9.91w
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
[quote=The Atheist]Originally posted by croflashOriginally posted by justblaze1011Originally posted by croflashOriginally posted by EZSumOriginally posted by "t_monk":zi4ndo0lwow.... dix is out...
Happy for Rodgers to get the win and ticket.
The meaning of "shape" that justblaze was using was the body itself. Like, are you fat, and your muscle mass smaller than normal, or are you good and lean with almost all muscle and low body fat percentage and lots of muscle mass.
The meaning of shape you were using, croflash, was like when a person gets in a car accident and you ask "Oh, how is he doing" and the doctor is like "Not good, he's in real bad shape, a metal rod smashed through his shoulder, he lost a lot blood"
It is possible to be in perfect "shape" (using the meaning of shape justblaze was referring to) and then someone cuts your head off with a sword while you are warming up. Obviously you will be in "bad shape" using the meaning that croflash was using, but the body itself (headless as it may be) would still be in perfect shape via the body fat/muscle mass definition.
So basically, what they are trying to say is, that they don't think the problem was that Dix's muscle mass was down, due to not working out, or that he was fat, due to not training or working out, rather, that his body was fine, and he was good and fit and everything but that his hamstring tweaked out on him, making it impossible for him to run fast.
Sorta like how Tyson Gay was in perfect shape last year when he hurt his hamstring in Eugene, but, he lost that 200m semi-final in Eugene due to an INJURY not due to being physically out of shape. Do you get what they are saying?[/quote:zi4ndo0l]
THANK YOU!!! Got some friggin idiots on this board I swear!!! I mean its not that hard to figure out you know.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RamGoatI knew Dix was't going to make it, a looooong time ago.. He just never looked right. I just couldn't fathom how people were matching him up to Challenge Powell..crazy... My Bets were always on Rogers.
Please explain your "logic" to me. :?
Comment
-
Originally posted by TrackDaddyOriginally posted by NumberCruncherWhat college did Rodgers run for?
He ran NAIA, I believe
Comment
-
Originally posted by MarlowOriginally posted by t_monkHow is that relay line up looking?
I'd think hard about having
Padgett (Holliday could run a early round here)
Patton (Rae)
Gay
Rodgers
If so, I think:
Rodgers
Spearmon
Gay
Patton
If not:
Rodgers
Patton
Gay
Edwards
Comment
-
Originally posted by jeremypOriginally posted by frontrunnerI am Powell's and Bolt's biggest fan. But right now I am worried about Tyson.
I would not bet against Tyson winning the 100/200 double at WC. I think he is that dangerous and focused. I know the wind was 3.4 but damn, 9.75 has got to mean something.
One love.
Comment
Comment