That's why Kipketer is in a class by himself with his three 1.41 times; neither Coe (49,7) nor Cruz (49,6) had gone that fast the first lap of their lifetime best races. The pacing in friday's event wasn't optimal for the resulting time for the winner (Borzakovskiy ran his own race as usual), though had Kaki remained in the hunt, this opening lap time may have made more sense.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oslo m800
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by EPelleThat's why Kipketer is in a class by himself with his three 1.41 times; neither Coe (49,7) nor Cruz (49,6) had gone that fast the first lap of their lifetime best races. The pacing in friday's event wasn't optimal for the resulting time for the winner (Borzakovskiy ran his own race as usual), though had Kaki remained in the hunt, this opening lap time may have made more sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dal4018Originally posted by bmanOriginally posted by AthleticsInBritainWhat an 800m! Al Sahli was wading through the water in the home straight. Can't believe Borza nicked it again from that far back!
Comment
-
You just might be right there. He's ahead of Bungei at 1.000m (2.17,27 to 2.18,60), and did run faster than has Bungei at 400m -- 46,3 to 46,99. However, he is behind at 800m -- 1.42,34 to 1.42,60. He certainly had the endurance (3.42,43).
Which of his races at 800m would you have suspected could have been run faster? Should he have actually split low 50-point or high-49 in that 1.42,60 run?
Comment
-
That would be one. It is hard to gauge and evaluate (in the 800 even more so than in other races) if it would have been possible and if, how much faster he could have run. He had four years of sub 1.43 runs, that is pretty remarkable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mojoOriginally posted by pela2Is Kaki now out of the WC?
Almost seems like it :?
It could just be a cramp and look worse than it is.
http://www.meetingareva.com/resultats/? ... epreuve=15
Comment
Comment