Tweet
:shock: and :lol:
I think Meadows went sub-1:59!
I think Meadows went sub-1:59!
-
:shock:
i am at work so i am trying not to shout at every race! but it's becoming very difficult! aahahghaghaghl;kjfasdf!
that was VERY impressive. -
FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She is looking like a clear medal threat with actually running better tactics!!Comment
-
OK new medalthreat to write down! What's that, a 2 second pb?Comment
-
Wow she got the pace right and looked awesome against a good field. Berlin here she comes? 1.57.84Comment
-
Well she took her bloody time dropping a sub 2 didn't she!?
Congrats to her though.Comment
-
Re: Monaco - Vessey 1:57.85
Er, Simpson you mean !Originally posted by nevetsllim:shock: and :lol:
I think Meadows went sub-1:59!
You're as bad as the commentating...how CLUELESS was that man !?Comment
-
Could be mistaken, but I think Lomong, Symmonds and Vessey all become #8 US all-time.Comment
-
-
I like Vessey. She continues to improve everytime she runs. This run makes her a favorite now in Berlin.Comment
-
Re: Monaco - Vessey 1:57.85
Err, Meadows was third :?Originally posted by lalalaEr, Simpson you mean !Originally posted by nevetsllim:shock: and :lol:
I think Meadows went sub-1:59!
You're as bad as the commentating...how CLUELESS was that man !?Comment
-
As I just said in another thread, Is anyone else fed up with this new "en vogue" camera angle that follows the athletes around the track in middle distance races and often you can't see how far people are ahead/behind ?Comment
-
Re: Monaco - Vessey 1:57.85
WAS she ? I didn't even realise she was in the race... :lol:Originally posted by nevetsllimComment
-
Wow... so many sub-2:00!!!!Comment
-
Re: Monaco - Vessey 1:57.85
No Jenny beat Jemma.Originally posted by lalalaEr, Simpson you mean !Originally posted by nevetsllim:shock: and :lol:
I think Meadows went sub-1:59!
You're as bad as the commentating...how CLUELESS was that man !?
Amazing times!!!
Why wasn't Maz there?Comment
Comment