I had to laugh reading it, because it sure seems like he's implying lots more. Here's some excerpts [with my bracketed remarks]:
Well, we are on our way to fixing it. We now have a sober, responsible, smaller Board of Directors [I got them all in AA]
So, how can we tell if it is still broken? We can tell:
If agents, perhaps, have the major role in determining the management of our relay program. [obviously they still are (London?)]
If entitlement is the dominant mindset of many of our athletes [ratchet down your support expectations, boys and girls]
If committee chairs arbitrarily make decisions that create chaos in competition and unsafe conditions [they were out of control, but I’m smacking them down, one-by-one]
If leaders take stands that are steeped in blatant conflicts of interest [i.e., business as usual here before]
Well, we are on our way to fixing it. We now have a sober, responsible, smaller Board of Directors [I got them all in AA]
So, how can we tell if it is still broken? We can tell:
If agents, perhaps, have the major role in determining the management of our relay program. [obviously they still are (London?)]
If entitlement is the dominant mindset of many of our athletes [ratchet down your support expectations, boys and girls]
If committee chairs arbitrarily make decisions that create chaos in competition and unsafe conditions [they were out of control, but I’m smacking them down, one-by-one]
If leaders take stands that are steeped in blatant conflicts of interest [i.e., business as usual here before]
Comment