Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Statistics 100/200

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Statistics 100/200

    Some statistics concerning the 100 and 200 (times sub 10 / 20, averages of best 10 times) needed some updates after Berlin(o). Here is the overview for the 100m:

    Times sub 10
    1 Asafa Powell 54
    2 Maurice Greene 51
    3 Ato Boldon 28
    4 Frank Fredericks 27
    5 Tyson Gay 17
    6 Usain Bolt 15
    7 Donovan Bailey 15
    8 Carl Lewis 15
    9 Justin Gatlin 11
    10 Dennis Mitchell 11

    Times sub 9.90
    1 Asafa Powell 26
    2 Usain Bolt 12
    3 Maurice Greene 10
    4 Tyson Gay 9
    5 Ato Boldon 8
    6 Frank Fredericks 3
    7 Justin Gatlin 3
    8 Shawn Crawford 3
    9 Leroy Burrell 2
    10 Bruny Surin 2

    Average top 10
    1 Usain Bolt 9.770
    2 Asafa Powell 9.779
    3 Tyson Gay 9.831
    4 Maurice Greene 9.848
    5 Ato Boldon 9.876
    6 Frank Fredericks 9.910
    7 Donovan Bailey 9.925
    8 Justin Gatlin 9.935
    9 Carl Lewis 9.936
    10 Leroy Burrell 9.936

  • #2
    And for the 200m:

    Times sub 20
    1 Frank Fredericks 25
    2 Michael Johnson 23
    3 Usain Bolt 16
    4 Wallace Spearmon 16
    5 Tyson Gay 12
    6 Carl Lewis 10
    7 Ato Boldon 8
    8 Shawn Crawford 8
    9 Michael Marsh 5
    10 Maurice Greene 5


    Average top 10
    1 Usain Bolt 19.649
    2 Michael Johnson 19.745
    3 Tyson Gay 19.764
    4 Wallace Spearmon 19.851
    5 Frank Fredericks 19.862
    6 Carl Lewis 19.875
    7 Ato Boldon 19.895
    8 Shawn Crawford 19.919
    9 Michael Marsh 19.963
    10 Maurice Greene 19.978

    Comment


    • #3
      Greene actually has 52 lifetime wind-legal automatic timing sub-10.00s

      Breakdown per year as follows:

      1997 = 8
      1998 = 8
      1999 = 9
      2000 = 6
      2001 = 7
      2002 = 5
      2003 = 1
      2004 = 8

      That adds up to 52.

      Comment


      • #4
        There has been a debate before whether Greene has 51, 52 or 53 sub 10s. I have excluded quarter finals in Edmonton and rolling start in Berlin 98 (9.94).

        Comment


        • #5
          Asafa could be the first man running 100 sub 10 but no gold medal that 's cruel... :shock:
          DO YOUR BEST!!!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by doctor sprint
            Asafa could be the first man running 100 sub 10 but no gold medal that 's cruel... :shock:
            The numbers show that Ato dropped some pretty special times too. But he doesn't have a gold to show for his efforts either.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by TrainerPhil
              Originally posted by doctor sprint
              Asafa could be the first man running 100 sub 10 but no gold medal that 's cruel... :shock:
              The numbers show that Ato dropped some pretty special times too. But he doesn't have a gold to show for his efforts either.
              Then who won the 200m at the 1997 World Championships?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by doctor sprint
                Asafa could be the first man running 100 sub 10 but no gold medal that 's cruel... :shock:
                It's already pretty cruel at 54.

                Comment


                • #9
                  For those who might wonder if 2009 was the best sub-10 year ever. It was not, only 2008 was better though. Here is an overview of all sub-10s for every year.

                  2009 41
                  2008 53
                  2007 18
                  2006 24
                  2005 16
                  2004 33
                  2003 9
                  2002 16
                  2001 16
                  2000 14
                  1999 26
                  1998 33
                  1997 38
                  1996 24
                  1995 5
                  1994 16
                  1993 8
                  1992 6
                  1991 13
                  1990 2
                  1989 2
                  1988 9
                  1987 1
                  1986 0
                  1985 1
                  1984 4
                  1983 3
                  1982 0
                  1981 0
                  1980 0
                  1979 0
                  1978 0
                  1977 1
                  1976 0
                  1975 0
                  1974 0
                  1973 0
                  1972 0
                  1971 0
                  1970 0
                  1969 0
                  1968 1

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Hano
                    For those who might wonder if 2009 was the best sub-10 year ever. It was not, only 2008 was better though. Here is an overview of all sub-10s for every year.

                    2009 41
                    2008 53
                    2007 18
                    2006 24
                    2005 16
                    2004 33
                    2003 9
                    2002 16
                    2001 16
                    2000 14
                    1999 26
                    1998 33
                    1997 38
                    1996 24
                    1995 5
                    1994 16
                    1993 8
                    1992 6
                    1991 13
                    1990 2
                    1989 2
                    1988 9
                    1987 1
                    1986 0
                    1985 1
                    1984 4
                    1983 3
                    1982 0
                    1981 0
                    1980 0
                    1979 0
                    1978 0
                    1977 1
                    1976 0
                    1975 0
                    1974 0
                    1973 0
                    1972 0
                    1971 0
                    1970 0
                    1969 0
                    1968 1
                    The point however, I speak for myself, is that ever more the sub 10s barrier is becoming abundant, just like counting sub 4-minute miles, no.

                    But I don't object anyone to make what-ever statistics they like.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X