Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Melaine Walker...52.42 to 55.02

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Smoke, all due respect, what you offered is no different than anyone else with resect to it being speculation.

    Sure times drop, but there are reasons why and this in part why we're discussing this. :wink:
    on the road

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Speedfirst
      Certainly we can all speculate why Ms Walker perfomance had such a decline and also why her Berlin performance was so brilliant. Again the discrepancy between the 2 races is staggering.
      The only staggering thing is your ignorance regarding the psychology of peak performance and the downside following such an outstanding result. There is nothing at all to speculate about.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by marknhj
        Originally posted by Speedfirst
        Certainly we can all speculate why Ms Walker perfomance had such a decline and also why her Berlin performance was so brilliant. Again the discrepancy between the 2 races is staggering.
        The only staggering thing is your ignorance regarding the psychology of peak performance and the downside following such an outstanding result. There is nothing at all to speculate about.
        What ignorance? Do you KNOW actually what caused the decline? I can call it staggering all I want, my choice, my perspective, not yours tough guy.

        What you just offered is your speculation, everyone doesn't have a decline after a major meet. Foster-Hylton ran the fastest time of the year after worlds, now is that ignorance?
        on the road

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by marknhj
          Originally posted by Speedfirst
          Certainly we can all speculate why Ms Walker perfomance had such a decline and also why her Berlin performance was so brilliant. Again the discrepancy between the 2 races is staggering.
          The only staggering thing is your ignorance regarding the psychology of peak performance and the downside following such an outstanding result. There is nothing at all to speculate about.
          Bolt 9.58- 9.81 and Gay 9.71-10.15 and Spearmon 19.8-20.8 ect ect
          phsstt!

          Comment


          • #20
            STOP FEEDING THE TROLLS !!
            i deserve extra credit

            Comment


            • #21
              :lol: :lol: If walker want to run 1:00 in the 400mH no problem,as long as she keeps peaking for the big ones.


              PEOPLE SHERONE IS COMING BACK, YESSSSSSSS 8-) 8-) 8-)

              Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

              Comment


              • #22
                I'm not some wet behind the ears, young whipper snapper, speaking off the top of my head. I understand what is required of athletes competing at this level and what it takes to perform at a meet of the magnitude of worlds.

                I am not discussing the Bolts, Gay's of the world, y'all are entilted to speculate on what you feel is the reason for the decline, just like I am. By the way, has anyone noticed I didn't speculate, but simply asked what she hurt or something? Again everyone doesn't have a decline, Foster-Hylton one example.


                P.S. mumpboy, do you think you control what anyone has to say? Maybe, just maybe you feel what you have to state is more important.
                on the road

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Speedfirst
                  What ignorance? Do you KNOW actually what caused the decline? I can call it staggering all I want, my choice, my perspective, not yours tough guy.

                  What you just offered is your speculation, everyone doesn't have a decline after a major meet. Foster-Hylton ran the fastest time of the year after worlds, now is that ignorance?
                  I'm fairly confident I've never been called a "tough guy" before.

                  However, putting that aside, if you need me to spell it out, the ignorance I referred to was your apparent complete lack of understanding of the psychological element of athletic performance. It's pretty basic stuff and I'm sorry it's beyond your comprehension.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X