29:12 10K.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chicago Marathon race commentary [split]
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gebfan2Originally posted by PegoOriginally posted by 2 centsHere's your formal abstract malmo. Of course, this doesn't change the fact that this is a strict analysis of data, which can only tell you so much....
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17473775
I see that the above quoted analysis doesn't even extend as low as 1ºC. Their lowest is 5ºC, a whooping 8ºF higher.
Pego, do runners lose fluids faster or slower as ambient temps drop?"A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
by Thomas Henry Huxley
Comment
-
Slower but the problem is that you aren't feeling the loss as much so have to remember to drink early and often. It doesn't look windy or wet which is what drains your energy in cold conditions. Seems like pace setting is going to be the key.
Comment
-
i lost this in the transfer:
LopenUupunut wrote:
The split table... (Are official live splits for Chicago '09 available anywhere?)
Great table!
The Science of Sport blog is doing kilo by kilo updates with finish time projection:
http://www.sportsscientists.com/
They're also projecting a 2:05:55 win for Wanjiru after a sub 1:02 half, slowdown due to winds and making sure to secure the win...
Comment
-
Thought this would be handy, too.
The split table... (Are official live splits for Chicago '09 available anywhere?)
km - Tergat - Lel - Geb07 - Geb08 - Rot09 - Lond09 - Chicago
05 - 0:15:01 - 0:14:22 - 0:14:44 - 0:14:34 - 0:14:41 - 0:14:08 - 0:14:34
10 - 0:29:58 - 0:29:10 - 0:29:27 - 0:29:12 - 0:29:18 - 0:28:30 - 0:29:12
15 - 0:44:46 - 0:44:00 - 0:44:16 - 0:44:02 - 0:44:15 - 0:43:12 - 0:43:59
20 - 0:59:45 - 0:58:58 - 0:59:10 - 0:58:49 - 0:59:05 - 0:58:14 - 0:58:50
½ - 1:03:03 - 1:02:13 - 1:02:29 - 1:02:03 - 1:02:35 - 1:01:35 - 1:02:00
25 - 1:14:43 - 1:13:47 - 1:14:05 - 1:13:39 - 1:14:07 - 1:13:35 -
30 - 1:29:25 - 1:28:29 - 1:28:56 - 1:28:27 - 1:28:52 - 1:28:35 -
35 - 1:44:00 - 1:43:54 - 1:43:38 - 1:43:05 - 1:43:15 - 1:43:18 -
40 - 1:58:38 - 1:58:53 - 1:58:08 - 1:57:34 - 1:57:54 - 1:58:32 -
Fin - 2:04:55 - 2:05:15 - 2:04:26 - 2:03:59 - 2:04:27 - 2:05:10 -
Comment
-
Originally posted by mump boyOriginally posted by bhallWill lose at least one of the pacers by 30k if not 25.
Didn't make it to 21k. Down to 1 pace setter.i deserve extra credit
Comment
-
From physiology thread...
Originally posted by Gebfan214:34, 14:38, 14: 47, 14:49 first 4 5k splits
1:02:01 at 1/2
Sammy not taking much fluids, and seem to be doing better job of running the tangents as the pack has thinned...
Comment
-
Return of the split table...
km - Tergat - Lel - Geb07 - Geb08 - Rot09 - Lond09 - Chicago
05 - 0:15:01 - 0:14:22 - 0:14:44 - 0:14:34 - 0:14:41 - 0:14:08 - 0:14:34
10 - 0:29:58 - 0:29:10 - 0:29:27 - 0:29:12 - 0:29:18 - 0:28:30 - 0:29:12
15 - 0:44:46 - 0:44:00 - 0:44:16 - 0:44:02 - 0:44:15 - 0:43:12 - 0:43:59
20 - 0:59:45 - 0:58:58 - 0:59:10 - 0:58:49 - 0:59:05 - 0:58:14 - 0:58:50
½ - 1:03:03 - 1:02:13 - 1:02:29 - 1:02:03 - 1:02:35 - 1:01:35 - 1:02:01
25 - 1:14:43 - 1:13:47 - 1:14:05 - 1:13:39 - 1:14:07 - 1:13:35 - 1:13:39
30 - 1:29:25 - 1:28:29 - 1:28:56 - 1:28:27 - 1:28:52 - 1:28:35 - 1:28:46
35 - 1:44:00 - 1:43:54 - 1:43:38 - 1:43:05 - 1:43:15 - 1:43:18 - 1:43:58
40 - 1:58:38 - 1:58:53 - 1:58:08 - 1:57:34 - 1:57:54 - 1:58:32 - 1:58:56
Fin - 2:04:55 - 2:05:15 - 2:04:26 - 2:03:59 - 2:04:27 - 2:05:10 - 2:05:41
Comment
Comment