I've heard multiple people talk about Isinbayeva's 4.86 and how that makes her certain to claim the outdoor WR (her own 4.82 at this point) as well, so just thought I'd mention for those who have forgotten that the IAAF no longer recognizes "outdoor world records" it recognizes "world records" and "indoor world records," meaning that if the indoor conditions don't violate the "outdoor" rules that mark becomes the (my word, not theirs) comprehensive WR.
So if all get ratified, Isinbayeva's 4.82 was actually broken three times this year: 4.83 by her at Donets'k, 4.85 by Feofanova in Athens and then the 4.86.
If the 4.83 is ratified (and I know of no reason it shouldn't be), then the IAAF is derelict in its duty if it doesn't go back and retroactively make Bubka's 6.15 from that venue (which is ratified as an indoor WR) the overall WR ahead of his outdoor 6.14. Logic says no other course of action is possible.
ps--note that USATF doesn't follow the same rules, so Dragila's 4.81 is only the indoor AR and doesn't get a share of the THE AR, her outdoor 4.81.
So if all get ratified, Isinbayeva's 4.82 was actually broken three times this year: 4.83 by her at Donets'k, 4.85 by Feofanova in Athens and then the 4.86.
If the 4.83 is ratified (and I know of no reason it shouldn't be), then the IAAF is derelict in its duty if it doesn't go back and retroactively make Bubka's 6.15 from that venue (which is ratified as an indoor WR) the overall WR ahead of his outdoor 6.14. Logic says no other course of action is possible.
ps--note that USATF doesn't follow the same rules, so Dragila's 4.81 is only the indoor AR and doesn't get a share of the THE AR, her outdoor 4.81.
Comment