This was discussed earlier, but Stanford CID is back at it again:
"In women's competition, Alicia Craig ran a 15:31.15 while Sara Bei ran 15:26.21 in the 5,000 meters to both qualify for the NCAA Regionals. Bei's previous best time was 16:03.08 at last year's Mt. Sac Relays. Bei's time was also third-best in school history."
This is the second time in less than a month they have misreported 5,000m facts on their site. The last time it centered around Alicia Craig:
"In the women's 5,000 meters, Alicia Craig gained All-America honors for a seventh time at Stanford with a second place in 15:45.08. Craig's time was just short of her school record time of 13:43.04 set last year. Kim Smith of Providence overpowered the field in a time of 15:14.18."
(http://gostanford.collegesports.com/spo ... 04aaa.html)
Gabe must be beating that drum a little too hard each time the CID is in the middle an athletics article.
"In women's competition, Alicia Craig ran a 15:31.15 while Sara Bei ran 15:26.21 in the 5,000 meters to both qualify for the NCAA Regionals. Bei's previous best time was 16:03.08 at last year's Mt. Sac Relays. Bei's time was also third-best in school history."
This is the second time in less than a month they have misreported 5,000m facts on their site. The last time it centered around Alicia Craig:
"In the women's 5,000 meters, Alicia Craig gained All-America honors for a seventh time at Stanford with a second place in 15:45.08. Craig's time was just short of her school record time of 13:43.04 set last year. Kim Smith of Providence overpowered the field in a time of 15:14.18."
(http://gostanford.collegesports.com/spo ... 04aaa.html)
Gabe must be beating that drum a little too hard each time the CID is in the middle an athletics article.
Comment