Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

final Oly Trials predictions now posted

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • aaronk
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Forget the Olympic heroes and medalists!!
    Forget the record breakers and sure bets to make the team!!
    Forget Gay, Lowe, Suhr, Rupp et al!!!!

    My two favorite athletes at the moment are two high school girls (though one just graduated, she is still considered a high schooler for record purposes).

    Mary Cain and Cayla Hatton!!
    They have ZERO chance to make the team!!

    Partly because there's too many who are much faster than they are.
    But also partly because they won't even be allowed to run!!!

    They're both outside the limits of entries allowed to race in the 1500 (Cain) and 10K (Hatton)

    Cain MIGHT be able to run the 800, but I feel her best distance is the 1500!!
    At worst, I think they'd run respectable races.
    At best, both could SHATTER the HS records (in the 1500 and 10K)!!

    I think the officials should allow them in!!!
    The crowd would eat it up!!!!
    (The Australians broke their rules for steepler LaCaze!!!)

    Leave a comment:


  • sprintdoc
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Note Robby Andrews has not declared in the 800 with just over hour left to do so. That would be a big shock if he indeed scratches.

    A bigger shock will be if the info I heard today proves true regarding an athlete picked to make the team that runs the first weekend reportedly had to go visit same doc as Dix just spent time with. If so we are sure to hear cries for an alternative system of Olympic qualifying.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bruce Kritzler
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Originally posted by nicest person ever
    Anyways, what about my infinitely more important first question (about Walter Dix). Anyone?:?:
    No surgery, just visiting miracle healer in Germany.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    I seem overly fascinated by A standards and depth. How many countries could come this close to filling up three rounds of sprints with A standard athletes? Presimibly, a couple east African countries could do it with 5, 10, and marathon but anyone else?

    Leave a comment:


  • gktrack
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Love the new formchart A/B Oly qualifier codes to keep track of things... and weather forecast for decathlon days is not too good: low-60's and 80%/30% chance of rain... gonna make it that much harder to score 8200 (including Clay) to get to London, for anyone other than Eaton/Hardee.

    Leave a comment:


  • nicest person ever
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Originally posted by 26mi235

    A in 5000, A in Marathon; guess what, just missed A in a warmer-than-expected race. Tell me who you think is better than Ritz and why you think that is the case. I think that Rupp can run 27:40 pace solo, and if he runs fast enough he is assured of being in the top three (since 3 guys are not going to outrun him). Thus, unless it is hot (could happen, but probably will only be warm), it will go at 27:30- pace, with Ritz and Rupp at the front.
    Okay FIIIIINE ritz is an underrated supergod, and I will now sacrifice some burnt goat offerings to him to apologize for my blasphemy etc

    Anyways, what about my infinitely more important first question (about Walter Dix). Anyone?

    :?:

    Leave a comment:


  • ATK
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Originally posted by gktrack
    example, for a few days now I've been watching P. Derosier's last chance 9.97 M100 sitting blank,
    That mark has not even shown up on the iaaf lists yet

    Leave a comment:


  • gktrack
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Originally posted by Dave
    Originally posted by gh
    Originally posted by Dave
    Didn't Jack Whitt recently get an A standard?...
    I believe their may have been some questions about the validity of the meet. The amount of unbelievable trash that poured in from "last chance" meets in East Podunk the last couple of weeks has been staggering.
    The website shows the 5.72 mark so it must have been deemed acceptable
    I believe if it shows "qualified" or "provisional", the mark is deemed acceptable. If it's blank or "not qualified", then there's a concern about the mark?, or in the process of checking... For example, for a few days now I've been watching P. Derosier's last chance 9.97 M100 sitting blank, as is J. Arnold's 7840 Deca, and time's running out w/ only a few hours left?

    Leave a comment:


  • 26mi235
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Originally posted by nicest person ever
    So, I guess off the top of my head the first two that I am wondering about are:


    2. Ritzenhein listed #2 in the 10k. He's not even listed in the 5k, and then in the 10k it shows an asterisk next to him meaning only a B-standard, whereas other strong guys below him such as Tegenkamp have an A-standard. I may have forgotten or missed a big win or strong placing by Ritz in a slow-pace race or something, so, wondering if this is the case (if so, I would like to know (I'm asking genuinely, not snottily, I have missed several meets this year, so I am actually really asking)), or, is he just being ranked high based on the AR from a while back?
    A in 5000, A in Marathon; guess what, just missed A in a warmer-than-expected race. Tell me who you think is better than Ritz and why you think that is the case. I think that Rupp can run 27:40 pace solo, and if he runs fast enough he is assured of being in the top three (since 3 guys are not going to outrun him). Thus, unless it is hot (could happen, but probably will only be warm), it will go at 27:30- pace, with Ritz and Rupp at the front.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Originally posted by gh
    Originally posted by Dave
    Didn't Jack Whitt recently get an A standard?...
    I believe their may have been some questions about the validity of the meet. The amount of unbelievable trash that poured in from "last chance" meets in East Podunk the last couple of weeks has been staggering.
    The website shows the 5.72 mark so it must have been deemed acceptable

    Leave a comment:


  • canadafan
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    I call Nia Ali as a sleeper in the 100 hurdles.

    Leave a comment:


  • gh
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Originally posted by gktrack
    guru - I thought you were joking also... try these two direct links for the June 19 versions:




    gh - you get the latest formchart if you go to "Formcharts" or "The Day's Best Reading" but I see what guru is saying, as the M&W formchart links under the "Results Links" section still directs one to the old formcharts
    aha! thanks.... had forgotten they had been linked there as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • odelltrclan
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    Originally posted by nicest person ever
    So, I guess off the top of my head the first two that I am wondering about are:

    2. Ritzenhein listed #2 in the 10k. He's not listed in the 5k, and it shows only an asterisk-time for the 10k, so, I am wondering why he is ranked so high for the 10k if there are lots of guys who have put up way better results in the 10k (I may be overlooking something obvious here, so I am actually genuinely just asking, not trying to initiate a debate or anything)
    Probably because the prognosticators want to look as good as possible and will look better when Ritz does finish 2nd.

    For easy picks, are there easier events to pick 1, 2 than the women's HJ and women's SP?

    Leave a comment:


  • nicest person ever
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    So, I guess off the top of my head the first two that I am wondering about are:

    1. Walter Dix being listed 3rd and 2nd in the 100m and 200m (didn't he just have a hamstring injury and have to fly off to some surgeon in Europe for surgery a week or two ago? Is he really expected to be recovered enough by a few days from now to perform at anywhere near that level at the OT's?)

    2. Ritzenhein listed #2 in the 10k. He's not even listed in the 5k, and then in the 10k it shows an asterisk next to him meaning only a B-standard, whereas other strong guys below him such as Tegenkamp have an A-standard. I may have forgotten or missed a big win or strong placing by Ritz in a slow-pace race or something, so, wondering if this is the case (if so, I would like to know (I'm asking genuinely, not snottily, I have missed several meets this year, so I am actually really asking)), or, is he just being ranked high based on the AR from a while back?

    Leave a comment:


  • gktrack
    replied
    Re: final Oly Trials predictions now posted

    guru - I thought you were joking also... try these two direct links for the June 19 versions:




    gh - you get the latest formchart if you go to "Formcharts" or "The Day's Best Reading" but I see what guru is saying, as the M&W formchart links under the "Results Links" section still directs one to the old formcharts

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎