Re: ¶2012 OG: w200–Allyson Felix (US) 21.88
Horridly inconsistent. Interesting viewpoint.
I'd like to understand how one becomes horridly inconsistent (despite running their second-fastest global championships time) from your perspective. Can you please help me understand what criteria you use to judge Felix against her predecessors? I'd like to understand why I object to this sentiment.
If you compare Felix to those past stars who ran sub-22 at the USAOT (the common denominator) then went on to both win and run sub-22 at the Olympics, you'll discover, remarkably enough, that Felix is on par or ahead.
Or, to simplify things, compare Felix to previous OT winners. See if she's was faster or slower in London than the previous USA Olympic Trials winners.
2008 EUG: 1. Allyson Felix (adi) 21,82w. 2012: Faster (legal wind)
2004 SAC: 1. Allyson Felix (adi) 22,28. 2012: Faster
2000 SAC: 1. Marion Jones (Nike) 21,94. 2012: Faster
1996 ATL: 1. Carlette Guidry (Adidas) 22,14. 2012: Faster
1992 ORL: 1. Gwen Torrence (Mazda) 22,03. 2012: Faster
The only real, valid data to work with is comparing Felix to Felix in 2008. It's the only venue where the OT's were contested at the same venue. There, Felix ran with an assisted wind. And, she didn't win the OG. Felix in 2012 slowed against the OT, but won the OG. Every athlete (save one) in the London final behind Felix ran slower than their best times.
I'm not seeing the horrid inconsistency. Perhaps my vision is weakening.
Originally posted by skiboo
I'd like to understand how one becomes horridly inconsistent (despite running their second-fastest global championships time) from your perspective. Can you please help me understand what criteria you use to judge Felix against her predecessors? I'd like to understand why I object to this sentiment.
If you compare Felix to those past stars who ran sub-22 at the USAOT (the common denominator) then went on to both win and run sub-22 at the Olympics, you'll discover, remarkably enough, that Felix is on par or ahead.
Or, to simplify things, compare Felix to previous OT winners. See if she's was faster or slower in London than the previous USA Olympic Trials winners.
2008 EUG: 1. Allyson Felix (adi) 21,82w. 2012: Faster (legal wind)
2004 SAC: 1. Allyson Felix (adi) 22,28. 2012: Faster
2000 SAC: 1. Marion Jones (Nike) 21,94. 2012: Faster
1996 ATL: 1. Carlette Guidry (Adidas) 22,14. 2012: Faster
1992 ORL: 1. Gwen Torrence (Mazda) 22,03. 2012: Faster
The only real, valid data to work with is comparing Felix to Felix in 2008. It's the only venue where the OT's were contested at the same venue. There, Felix ran with an assisted wind. And, she didn't win the OG. Felix in 2012 slowed against the OT, but won the OG. Every athlete (save one) in the London final behind Felix ran slower than their best times.
I'm not seeing the horrid inconsistency. Perhaps my vision is weakening.
Comment