At least 19.6? Even Johnson only ran faster than that once. Only 4 men in history have run sub 19.6. But you might be right! It's just crazy.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Will Kirani James break Michael Johnson's 400m world record??
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Tuariki View PostI agree that speed appears to be James' weak point at the moment. At age 21 James best 200m is 20.41 compared to MJ's 20.07 at the same age. To break the WR I believe James needs to be able to run the 200m in at least 19.6
If he gets 20.0-20.1 it will be really great
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tuariki View PostSo tell us all your reasons and your theories why Kirani James will never get down to 19.6
Comment
-
Tuariki your challenging ZELLGADISS' logic that it wont happen with logic that doesn't seem to be much better.
Comparing saying that Kirani will improve in the same fashion as MJ did based on age makes no sense. What if you compare James to Butch, Wariner Watts etc? Do the times line up based on age? Merrirt just ran 43.74 at age 27 while James did it at 21.
MJ is probably the oddball in the 400m. I wouldn't use him as the standard for determining another athletes progression.
Also, You said that he would need at least sub 19.6 to break the WR. So to run 43.17, he would need to run 19.59. This is flawed as well.
Butch's PR is .11 from the WR with a 200m PR .87 slower than sub 19.6
Wariner is .27 from the WR with a 200m PR .60 slower than sub 19.6
Watts is .32 from the WR with a 200m PR .91 slower than sub 19.6
etc...
Comment
-
Originally posted by ATK View PostHuh?
Since when was Johnson Radcliffe's coach?
Since when was Johnson any high profile pro track athlete's coach?
You said James should have MJ be his coach because he is good that stuff. What examples do you have of MJ coaching athletes to world records?Bolt's last year...and my last year as a track fan, it's been fun
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tuariki View PostOnly one tiny wee problem - the WR holder blows that theory to hell and back
Also, it's worth noting that Michael Johnson never singularly focused on the 400 until near the end of his career. He was thought of as a 200 runner who also ran the 400 until 1999, when he broke the record in Seville.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JumboElliott View PostAlso, it's worth noting that Michael Johnson never singularly focused on the 400 until near the end of his career. He was thought of as a 200 runner who also ran the 400 until 1999, when he broke the record in Seville.
Comment
-
Okay, 1999 might be a little early. Perhaps 1996 or 1997 is where I should have cut it off. His first World Championship and his first two world records were in the 200.
Also, using the IAAF scoring tables, 19.32 > 43.18Last edited by JumboElliott; 08-08-2014, 03:49 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JumboElliott View PostOkay, 1999 might be a little early. Perhaps 1996 or 1997 is where I should have cut it off. His first World Championship and his first two world records were in the 200.
Comment
-
In none of my postings have I said that James will break the WR, run 43.3 or 43.4 or 19.6.
I have no idea what James will eventually finish up with as a lifetime best. It may be he has already reached them. Logic suggests he probably hasn't.
What I have done is challenged Zellgadiss to back up his claims with his reasoning that James will 100% definitely not run 43.3 and 19.6. I have no problem in accepting Zellgadiss' reasoning as being valid speculation, even if I may disagree with it. Hell, I might even end up agreeing.
Comment
Comment