Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No "16 feet"

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Powell
    replied
    Re: No

    >The Brits were able to guess how high 4.88m
    >was by assuming 1m=3ft.

    ...which would put Feofanova at 14.64 ft :-p

    Leave a comment:


  • Sprintstatman
    replied
    Re: No

    Just out of interest I contacted ten T&F fan friends of mine from Europe - five Brits, two Dutch, two French and a German. None was aware that the 16' barrier had been broken in the women's PV. The Brits were able to guess how high 4.88m was by assuming 1m=3ft. The others had no clue at all. None was able to tell me the imperial measure of a single field WR, except two of the Brits who knew that Beamon had jumped over 29' and so the LJ WR must be a bit over that.

    FWIW.

    Leave a comment:


  • eldrick
    replied
    Re: No

    i think the first 300' JT & 60' TJ were more resonant barriers to break - nice round numbers !

    Leave a comment:


  • Powell
    replied
    Re: No

    >You are correct - no one outside of the USA knows or cares.

    I do know, but I still do not care :-D

    Leave a comment:


  • Grazerism
    replied
    Re: No

    My mistake on Feo's PR. The German commentators had it at 4.78--and I believed them! However, her previous best this outdoor season was 4.70 (15-5).

    By the way, Stacy still has 5 of the top 8 outdoor marks this year. See iaaf stats.

    Leave a comment:


  • tafnut
    replied
    Re: No

    ha! who says those guys in Mtn View ain't got no sense of humor? They moved my politics thread over to the Dope Board! I thought they killed it. Thanks, Jon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon
    replied
    Re: No

    >sorry to interrupt this thread, but I just started a new thread that bh or gh
    >pulled in about 4 nanoseconds.



    You mean the one that was moved to the THG section...?

    Leave a comment:


  • tafnut
    replied
    Re: No

    sorry to interrupt this thread, but I just started a new thread that bh or gh pulled in about 4 nanoseconds. I said that it would die a 'quick and painful death' but didn't realize the irony of my statement. My bad, boys - point taken.

    We now resume this thread without further interruption.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill S.
    replied
    Re: No

    Here we go again...

    Leave a comment:


  • tafnut
    replied
    Re: No

    Jon, I was being facetious. Of course others besides US fans care, but yes, you're right, a few Euro bad apples have upset our cart. Basically we all see eye to eye in what excited us, but the actual performance depends on the measurement system to really get us hepped up. 20m isn't as good as 70' , but we both get excited when our SPers do it.

    Leave a comment:


  • avaulteriam
    replied
    Re: No

    For the record, it was actually a 3cm pr, seeing as to how outdoor and indoor is not differentiated between any longer. And, if you look at her form this season, I'm not at all surprised, as she does have Polnova and Isinbayeva pushing her. Not to mention Dragila looking sharp over here... Should be an OG with a WR...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon
    replied
    Re: No

    Yes, I am 'trackometric', but to say that nobody outside the US knows or cares about the 16ft barrier being broken is plain wrong. I, for one, know and care about it, even if the commentators didn't mention it. Didn't you learn from Rob's inane anti-American posts that one person's opinions and actions doesn't respresent those of the nation from which they come? I don't see how, just because a couple of British commentators didn't mention it, you've managed to figure that anyone outside of USA doesn't know or care.

    Like I say - I do care about it. I feel it's a great shame that Dragila didn't reach the mark first, seeing as she had been striving for the mark for so many years. Of the leading vaulting women, I least expected Feofanova to get it (I thought Isinbayeva or Dragila would get it first). Either way, I doubt it will last for long. 4.90m will happen very soon (and 5.00m soon after, although we may have to wait til 2005 for that).

    Leave a comment:


  • tafnut
    replied
    Re: No

    Ahem? I seriously thought the Brits were just as heatedly trackometric as the rest of the Euros.

    Leave a comment:


  • Grazerism
    replied
    Re: No

    Would you care to elaborate on that, Jon? Seriously, I can't get anyone to bite on my question about British commentators reporting feet and inches.

    I'm American and also basically think in feet and inches. I'm really sorry that Stacy didn't get the first 4.88/16'!

    Feo's WR is a pretty huge surprise. She's been looking weak--and this was a 10cm (4") PB!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon
    replied
    Re: No

    >no one outside of the USA knows or cares.




    Ahem...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X