Nice to see Charlene Lipsey end an amazing season in the 800m with another sub 1:58 run.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2017 Weltklasse
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Tuariki View PostDamn right!! How dare he get sick; how he dare miss his 400m final
He said on Facebook that he had been the victim of a "government trap."
"I still maintain I am not sick and have never been tested by any Doctor. I shall rise again," he wrote."
Comment
-
Originally posted by scottmitchell74 View PostI noticed that and was wondering, aaronk. But when they showed the replay, it didn't seem to affect placement. I wonder if they would have DQ'ed him if he had literally displaced one of them from the standings?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AFelixFan View PostI was most impressed with Miller-Uibo today. Her equalling her 100m PR in Birmingham suggested she was ready to run something under 22 today, and I figured it'd be good enough to win, but wasn't sure she could run a new PR. Now that she has, I wonder if she can break 49 seconds next week in Brussels. She should at least be in PR shape over the 400m as well. I'm not sure Felix can get close to her in Miller-Uibo's present form, but if the conditions are good, it should be a fast race.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Atticus View PostSo I wonder aloud again, how much merit should we give SM-U's win here. This race is anti-climactic for Schippers, and I'm not so sure she should lose traction in the Rankings for this 4th place finish. I understand the Rankings are expressly related to a 'season's' oeuvre, but at some point mustn't the rankers give allowance for the 'significance' (or lack thereof) of a particular meet in the context of Championship season. And yes, I realize there was a lot at stake in this race in this meet, but at some point we must 'forgive' DS for her loss of focus here.
This year diamond league winners don't even get to use a bye into worlds so other than the 50k no other incentive to get up for this meet.
Yes there were a couple of good races but generally another lackluster late season meet!Last edited by tm71; 08-25-2017, 05:57 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tm71 View PostYes there were a couple of good races but generally another lackluster late season meet.
Makwala 43.95
Kendricks 5.87 to stay undefeated
Manyonga 8.49
Semenya 1:55.84
Jebet 8:55.29
Pearson & Nelvis virtual dead heat at 12.55
Thrilling 5K finish
Yep, pretty lackluster.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gm View PostMiller-Uibo 21.88
Makwala 43.95
Kendricks 5.87 to stay undefeated
Manyonga 8.49
Semenya 1:55.84
Jebet 8:55.29
Pearson & Nelvis virtual dead heat at 12.55
Thrilling 5K finish
Yep, pretty lackluster.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lonewolf View PostI wondered why Chelimo was not immediately DQd? The initial results had him in 2nd place, (I think) ..about as blatant foul as I can recall witnessing..
Found a GREAT YouTube video---3:56 in length--which shows highlights from that race---incuding the point when Gammoudi did EXACTLY the same thing with Clarke & Mills---except much earlier--with about 300 meters to go!!
This video has VERY clear images & audio, and shows the entire last lap of the race, plus the start (You see Mills & Lindgren up front!!).
Check it out!
Just google "Tokyo Olympics 10000 race in 1964--video".
There's a few shorter vids, but watch the one that's 3:56 long!
Comment
-
Originally posted by bhall View PostNot exactly. It is a judgement call on where the arm ends and torso begins when the shoulder leads. The reader has to visualize where the acromion process is. As I said, I know the process. I think the photo read is questionable.
I have worked on photo-finish teams using a single camera where I feel that a decision has been made to 'split' two athletes in situations fairly similar to this that I personally would have been happy to call a dead heat. Conversely, I have been in situations where a dead heat has been given with a single camera when most of the team felt fairly confident that a 'reverse' camera would probably have given a clear decision to a particular athlete.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 18.99s View PostTrue dat. And it encourages those with a few wins early in the season to skip the remaining meets before the final, since at that point they've done enough to qualify for the final and there's no additional benefit to more points.
I believe the goal of this new format was to avoid situations where the leading athlete already has enough points to clinch the DL title before the final meet. But this approach takes it to the other extreme, seriously diminishing the importance of the rest of the season.
I think a better balance would be to define the overall DL winner as the athlete who has the most points out of the top 3 placers in the final. Thus no matter how many points you have you still have to put in enough effort to be in the top 3, and you also have to take the rest of the season seriously because the point standings will determine whether you need to place 1st, 2nd or 3rd to win the DL trophy.
Comment
Comment