I don't know why people are acting as if athletes are victims here.
If you are a bonafide citizen of a country and have NOT represented another country at any level internationally, and are not beholden to the organising body of the sport in your original country (i.e. they haven't been funding your development), then you are typically good to go. For example, it doesn't matter than Mo Farah was born in Somalia. He was raised in the UK, was a UK citizen, and chose to start running for the UK. Presumably, if he had Somali citizenship also, and decided from the outset of his career to represent Somalia (and UK Athletics had no obvious claim on him), then he'd have been good to go too (see Mondo Duplantis).
If you START representing one country and then DECIDE to represent another, you have to sit out a period of Championship eligibility to do so until you become eligible. Makes sense to me.
Quirky examples will arise (your country is dissolved e.g. Churandy Martina) that may warrant exceptions. Some countries will be hardasses (e.g. Denmark and Kipketer's nightmares).
But, it's pretty clear that Jack Harvey is not Turkish!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
IAAF acts on Transfer of Allegiance
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Tuariki View PostHe should stay with Antigua. He’ll be one sorry young man if he finishes 4th or worse at USA OT
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tuariki View PostHe should stay with Antigua. He’ll be one sorry young man if he finishes 4th or worse at USA OT
Obviously it's in Nike's interest to have him run for the US over a country with 100,000 people, and I expect they structured the contract to be consistent with that. In particular, if running for Antigua he wouldn't be able to benefit from bonuses for placing high at the US trials or breaking the American record.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tuariki View PostHe should stay with Antigua. He’ll be one sorry young man if he finishes 4th or worse at USA OT
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by crymeariver View PostTransfer of Allegiance is one of those Coe initiatives that lead me to believe that he's not the man to move the sport forward. This rule is a joke (but the previous rule was no better). Why? Because the penalty for transfer is longer than the penalty for a PED positive test.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tuariki View PostHe should stay with Antigua. He’ll be one sorry young man if he finishes 4th or worse at USA OT
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by player View PostI believe Rai Benjamin last competed for Antigua in spring 2015 at the World Relays.
He declined to compete for Antigua at Rio in 2016.
Not sure when he submitted his request to transfer allegiance to USA but hope he will be good to go for 2019 Worlds.
He should have no problem with the credibility and citizenship requirements.
Leave a comment:
-
The whole thing is a non-issue being made into an issue by Europeans who are jealous that the talent is going to the Middle East / Asia and not Europe.
Leave a comment:
-
Transfer of Allegiance is one of those Coe initiatives that lead me to believe that he's not the man to move the sport forward. This rule is a joke (but the previous rule was no better). Why? Because the penalty for transfer is longer than the penalty for a PED positive test. Now which one is greater threat to the sport?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Powell View PostSo Mo Farah would have had to represent Somalia?
Mondo would be an example as well if he hadn't competed for Sweden within the last three years.
Leave a comment:
-
I think we're going to have to see the actual language of the new rules to be more sure of how those rules would apply to individual situations--past, present, and future.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Powell View PostSo Mo Farah would have had to represent Somalia?Last edited by 18.99s; 07-29-2018, 05:47 PM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: