Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Women's Olympic 50k RW Lawsuit
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by polevaultpower View Posthttps://www.insidethegames.biz/artic...XzVgFhbLMu-X1o
I'm still salty that the IAAF added the co-ed 4x400 INSTEAD of the women's 50k RW.
-
-
Originally posted by polevaultpower View PostI'm still salty that the IAAF added the co-ed 4x400 INSTEAD of the women's 50k RW.Originally posted by thedoorknobbroke View Postanother chance for a USA gold medal
Comment
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Trickstat View PostI'm wondering about the most practical way of doing an event where, for example, one person swims 100m followed by a 400m run and a bike leg of either 800 or 1000m.
The 100m using a swimming stroke (preferably butterfly) on the same track will be better than any Japanese TV torture show, hence the superior viewing and money-making potential compare to current IAAF. [not really joking]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by El Toro View PostThe 400 and bike leg are easy to do on a standard 400m track.
The 100m using a swimming stroke (preferably butterfly) on the same track will be better than any Japanese TV torture show, hence the superior viewing and money-making potential compare to current IAAF. [not really joking]
An endurance version of the same race would be much easier to do. Although there might be concerns that weaker cyclists could be overly assisted by drafting dependent on how it is arranged.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Trickstat View PostI'm not sure whether it is feasible for a cyclist to try and take a turn at about 60kph (37 mph) without banking. Although it will be less tight than on a 250m velodrome.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JumboElliott View PostI have respect for walkers, because they're better athletes than me, but it shouldn't be an Olympic sport.
Also, this isn't sex discrimination in the legal (Title VII) sense.
Comment
-
Comment