Distance records pre-'70s need asterisk?

[gh]

Re: Distance records pre-'70s need asterisk?

post by cornstarch pulled at this point: probably set a new board record for rumormongering and bad science. That also cut these two subsequent posts (reminder: you are inextricably linked with whatever post you click on to reply, so if it's a bad one,you get caught in the shuffle). So you gotta post again, if you care.

[hi-tech]

Re: Distance records pre-'70s need asterisk?

Maybe you should tell Baldini that his win in Athens doesn't mean anything because a lot of Africans couldn't compete against him because of one reason or another!

[Daisy]

Re: Distance records pre-'70s need asterisk?

>post by cornstarch pulled at this point: probably set a new board record for
>rumormongering and bad science. That also cut these two subsequent posts
>(reminder: you are inextricably linked with whatever post you click on to
>reply, so if it's a bad one,you get caught in the shuffle). So you gotta post
>again, if you care.

Thanks for the heads up but with out cornstarches post my point is irrelevant. I'd rather see the bad science post pulled than have to challenge it.