Final U.S. Lists For 2004

[gh]

There are always a few marks that straggle in (very) late, but as best as we can tell, the men's lists you'll now find in that section of the site are now complete: 40 performers, 10 performances, with meet and date, classes for all collegians.

Women's lists go up next week after the PDF is e-mailed to subscribers.

[tafnut]

Re: Final U.S. Lists For 2004

>>the men's lists you'll now find in that section of the site are now>complete: 40 performers, 10 performances, with meet and date, classes for all>collegians.<<

Somewhere along the way we lost the 50-deep lists which is exremely lamentable. I know Scott Davis goes deeper in the FAST Annual, but that's a long wait for us stat geeks. Why is going 10 more such a hardship?

[gh]

Re: Final U.S. Lists For 2004

because it's an exponential rise in the amount of data that needs to be tracked. You don't just find marks for another 10 people; you find all the performances to that level for all the people above that.

[tafnut]

Re: Final U.S. Lists For 2004

>>because it's an exponential rise in the amount of data that needs to be>tracked. You don't just find marks for another 10 people; you find all the>performances to that level for all the people above that.<<

I see. Any chance you and Scott's data gatherers could work together or are their timetables too slow?